Below is the abstract of a recently published Drug Safety article that came out of a HHS, NIH, NIAID-funded study that actually acknowledges – contrary to the Establishment-approved narrative - the existence of vaccine-induced neurotoxicity (especially vaccine-induced encephalopathy resulting in childhood seizure disorders) and other adverse toxic effects following the cocktails of vaccines that are injected during routine well child exams , vaccines that always contain numbers of toxic ingredients, which have never been studied for safety when given in cocktails.
The article appears in the October 2020 issue of Drug Safety.
One of the authors (Martin Kulldorff) is a signatory and defender of the allegedly” controversial” Great Barrington Declaration(https://gbdeclaration.org/) that logically and scientifically encourages allowing natural herd immunity to develop against the SARS-CoV-2 virus (a la Sweden’s remarkably successful no-lock-down program, despite massive Big Pharma-generated attempts to discredit it) rather than continuing the failed economy- and job-destroying regional/national lock-downs until some of the potentially lethal cocktails and booster shots of unproven-for-long-term-safety or efficacy vaccines that are being dangerously fast-tracked through the FDA approval process.
Kulldorff made a valiant attempt to defend the Great Barrington Declaration (which I have also signed) on the October 15, 2020 Democracy Now program. The interview had obviously been orchestrated to sabotage him and the so-called “controversial” Declaration by the two Democracy Now interviewers and a second academic professor of Public Health “panel member”.
The three adversaries took turns trying to discredit the Declaration and natural herd immunity. But they also tried – and failed - to promote a so-called “vaccine-induced herd immunity”, which is an impossibility, given the well-established medical fact that only a natural infection with a virus is capable of stimulating – simultaneously - both cellular/mucosal immunity and humoral/serological immunity against that virus.
True science-based vaccinologists (ie, those that do not have conflicts of financial [or career-enhancing] interest working for for-profit corporations or government bureaucracies) know that the highly abnormal intramuscular injection of a lab-produced viral antigen – with toxic preservatives and adjuvants mixed in the antigen - can only stimulate the humeral/serological immune system that is only (potentially) capable of (theoretically) producing uncertain amounts of specific, short-lived antibodies to one of the many proteins that are located on the surface of the virus.
This difference between the two types of natural immunity has been succinctly explained in the following quotation that expresses truly science-based wisdom (something that used to be taught in medical schools before the pharmaceutical industry steadily took control of both clinical and academic medicine).
The quote comes from Dr Harold Buttram’s forward to Neil Z. Miller’s important book, Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective?,
“The human immune system is divided into two major classes:
1) Cellular/mucosal Immunity (for which injected vaccines do absolutely nothing, except to weaken immunity),located in the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts and their respective lymph nodes, and
2) Humoral Immunity, with production of antigen-specific antibodies by plasma cells in the bone marrow.
“For eons of time the mucous membranes of the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts have been the primary sites of infectious microbe entry into the body so that, of necessity, cellular/mucosal immunity has evolved as the primary defense system, with humoral immunity serving a secondary or backup role… Vaccines are reversing these roles, attempting to substitute vaccine-induced humoral immunity for the far more efficient cellular/mucosal immunity, the latter in turn undergoing a process of “atrophy of disuse” as a result of this (vaccine-induced) role-switching.”-- Harold Buttram, MD
Scientists, physicians, epidemiologists, bureaucrats, policy-makers, politicians, journalists, etc who intentionally ignore the science of natural herd immunity and instead advocate for the uncertain, dangerous, temporary, partial, short-term immunity promised by shot-in-the-dark coronavirus vaccines must be thought of as Big Pharma shills.
The members of the above groups that are ignorant of the science of natural herd immunity are likely just gullible victims of the pervasive propaganda campaign that has been so successfully orchestrated by the extremely wealthy and influential vaccine industry, the billionaire shareholders of pharmaceutical corporations in the World Economic Forum, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (and its proclaimed de-population agenda), Wall Street investors in Big Pharma stocks, politicians that are beholden to their corporate campaign donors and the compliant media that accepts advertising and sponsorships from Big Pharma.
These facilitators of the lock-down-induced crises need to stop being so didactic and one-sided about COVID-19.
Journalists especially need to start doing investigative journalism again. But first they need to somehow apologize for intentionally (or unintentionally) misleading their listeners. And journalists need to refrain from ever again being so compliant with the agendas of the sociopathic corporations that are constantly trying to rule the parts of the world that they don’t already rule.
And every concerned citizen needs to acquire the basic knowledge of the true sciences of vaccinology and virology – but they must only listen to those “experts” that have no conflicts of interest with industry (ie, the true scientists that have been black-listed from the media ever since October of 2019, when the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health and the Gates Foundation put on the tabletop spectacle called Event 201, which primed the world for what to do when (not if) a world-wide pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus would occur.
For much more on these topics, there are any number of wonderful websites. For starters, go to Robert Kennedy, Jr’s Children’s Health Defense website at https://childrenshealthdefense.org/; Del Bigtree’s HighWire interview program at https://thehighwire.com/; or Barbara Loe Fisher’s National Vaccine Information Center atwww.nvic.org; or Dr Joseph Mercola’s website at https://vaccines.mercola.com/.
_____________________________________________________________________
Drug Saf 2020 Oct;43(10):1057-1065.
Determining Which of Several Simultaneously Administered Vaccines Increase Risk of an Adverse Event
Shirley V Wang 1, Kristina Stefanini 2, Edwin Lewis 3, Sophia R Newcomer 4, Bruce Fireman 5, Matthew F Daley 4 6, Jason M Glanz 4 7, Jonathan Duffy 8, Eric Weintraub 8, Martin Kulldorff 2
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32613596/
Full article available at https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/drugsa/v43y2020i10d10.1007_s40264-020-00967-8.html
Author affiliations
< >1Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA. swang1@bwh.harvard.edu.2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 3030, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.3Kaiser Permanente Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA.4Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.5Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA.6Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.7Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA.8Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.PMID: 32613596 PMCID: PMC7501163 (available on 2021-10-01)DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00967-8
Results: In all simulations, we were able to determine which vaccines contributed to excess risk. In the empirical data, we narrowed the association with seizure from all vaccines in the schedule to three likely candidates, DTaP, PCV, and/or Haemophilus influenzae type B (HiB) (p < 0.01, attributable risk when all three were administered together: five per 100,000). Disentangling their associations with seizure would require a larger sample or more variation in the combinations administered. When none of these three were administered, no excess risk was observed.
Conclusion: The process outlined could provide valuable information on the magnitude of potential risk from individual and simultaneousvaccinations. Associations should be further investigated with independent data as well as biologically based, statistically independent hypotheses.
Similar articles
< >Immunogenicity and safety of a combination diphtheria, tetanus toxoid, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus vaccine coadministered with a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine and a Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine.Pichichero ME, Bernstein H, Blatter MM, Schuerman L, Cheuvart B, Holmes SJ; 085 Study Investigators.J Pediatr. 2007 Jul;151(1):43-9, 49.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.02.013.PMID: 17586189 Clinical Trial.< >Immunogenicity and safety following primary and booster vaccination with a hexavalent diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine: a randomized trial in the United States.Klein NP, Abu-Elyazeed R, Cheuvart B, Janssens W, Mesaros N.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(4):809-821. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1549449. Epub 2019 Jan 4.PMID: 30444673 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
< >Risk of febrile seizures and epilepsy after vaccination with diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, inactivated poliovirus, and Haemophilus influenzae type B.Sun Y, Christensen J, Hviid A, Li J, Vedsted P, Olsen J, Vestergaard M.JAMA. 2012 Feb 22;307(8):823-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.165.PMID: 22357833
< >New acellular pertussis-containing paediatric combined vaccines.Pines E, Barrand M, Fabre P, Salomon H, Blondeau C, Wood SC, Hoffenbach A.Vaccine. 1999 Mar 26;17(13-14):1650-6. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00422-8.PMID: 10194818 Review.
< >New combination vaccines: DTaP-IPV (Kinrix) and DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel).Johns TL, Hutter GE.Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):515-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M468.PMID: 20197476 Review.
Show more similar articles See all similar articles
Related information
< >MedGenR01 AI107721/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/United StatesR01AI107721-01/Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health