Bush and Iraq: the truth at last
January 16, 2004
Here we have former U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill disclosing that George Bush came into office planning to overthrow Saddam Hussein, and MSNBC polls its audience with the question, Did O'Neill betray Bush?
Is that really the big question? The White House had a sharper nose for the real meat of Leslie Stahl's "60 Minutes" interview with O'Neill and Ron Suskind, the reporter who based much of his expose of the Bush White House, "The Price of Loyalty," on 19,000 government documents O'Neill provided him.
What bothers the White House is one particular National Security Council (NSC) document shown in the "60 Minutes" interview, clearly drafted in the early weeks of the new administration, which showed plans for the post-invasion dispersal of Iraq's oil assets among the world's great powers, starting with the major oil companies.
For the brief moment it was on the TV screen one could see that this bit of paper, stamped Secret, was undoubtedly one of the most explosive documents in the history of imperial conspiracy. Here, dead center in the camera's lens, was the refutation of every single rationalization for the attack on Iraq ever offered by George W. Bush and his co-conspirators, including Tony Blair.
That NSC document told "60 Minutes'" vast audience the attack on Iraq was not about national security in the wake of 9/11. It was not about weapons of mass destruction. It was not about Saddam Hussein's possible ties to Osama bin Laden. It was about stealing Iraq's oil, the same way the British stole it three quarters of a century earlier. The major oil companies drew up the map, handed it to their man George, helped him (through such trusties as James Baker) steal the 2000 election and then told him to get on with the attack.
O'Neill says that the Treasury Department's lawyers OK'ed release of the document to him. The White House, which took 78 days to launch an investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame as a CIA officer, clearly regards the disclosure of what Big Oil wanted as truly reprehensible, as opposed to endangering the life of Ms. Plame. It's going after O'Neill for this supposed security breach.
Forget about O'Neill "betraying" Bush. How about Bush lying to the American people? It's obvious from that document that Bush, on the campaign trail in 2000, was as intent on regime change in Iraq as was Clinton in his second term and as Gore was publicly declaring himself to be.
Here's Bush in debate with Gore Oct. 3, 2000:
"If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. I'm going to prevent that."
The second quote is from a joint press conference with Tony Blair on Jan. 31, 2003. Bush's reply:
"Actually, prior to September 11, we were discussing smart sanctions. We were trying to fashion a sanction regime that would make it more likely to be able to contain somebody like Saddam Hussein. After September 11, the doctrine of containment just doesn't hold any water. The strategic vision of our country shifted dramatically because we now recognize that oceans no longer protect us, that we're vulnerable to attack. And the worst form of attack could come from somebody acquiring weapons of mass destruction and using them on the American people. | now realize the stakes. I realize the world has changed. My most important obligation is to protect the American people from further harm, and I will do that."
In his cabinet meetings before 9/11, Bush may, in O'Neill's words, have been like a blind man in a room full of deaf people. But, as O'Neill also says, in those early strategy meetings Bush did say the plan from the start was to attack Iraq, using any pretext. Bush's language about "smart sanctions" from the press conference at the start of last year was as brazen and far more momentous a lie as any of those that earned Bill Clinton the Republicans' impeachment charges.
Alexander Cockburn is coeditor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2004 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Email this article to a friend
"Ten good groups that need help"
December 29, 2004
"Don't they know it's Christmas? It's moral outrage time!"
December 22, 2004
"Be a hero on 805 percent a year"
December 19, 2004
"Animals don't vote"
December 19, 2004
"Gary Webb and the art of the CIA cover-up"
December 15, 2004
"Politicize the CIA? You've got to be kidding!"
December 1, 2004
"Let them drink sand"
November 23, 2004
"Now for the really bad news"
November 11, 2004
"No silver lining as crows come home"
November 4, 2004
"From Detroit to Baghdad: Intimations of Ed Seitz"
October 27, 2004
"The free speech movement and John Kerry"
October 18, 2004
"'There are no innocents'"
October 8, 2004
"Why Nazis banned Fraktura"
September 28, 2004
"Ralph, go to the West Bank, go to Baghdad!"
September 23, 2004
"The stench of doom"
September 2, 2004
August 26, 2004
"Kerry makes a strong case for Nader"
August 9, 2004
"Presidential elections 2004: Not as big a deal as they say"
August 9, 2004
July 28, 2004
"Nader and the conspiracy of silence"
July 22, 2004
"Boston awaits dead party"
July 14, 2004
"Venezuela: the gang's all here!"
June 25, 2004
"Reagan in truth and fiction"
June 10, 2004
"Kerry gives CPR to stricken prez"
May 27, 2004
"The empire, seen from Oceanside"
May 21, 2004
"Greenlights for torture"
May 13, 2004
"Torture: as American as apple pie"
May 5, 2004
"Stupid leaders, useless spies, angry world"
April 29, 2004
"Clouds loom over Kerry challenge"
April 22, 2004
"Bush, Kerry and empire"
April 19, 2004
"Pulitzers and Prozac"
April 8, 2004
"Gay marriage: a step back in freedom's faltering march"
March 16, 2004
"Understanding the world with Paul Sweezy"
March 10, 2004
"The uproar over Nader"
March 3, 2004
"Winning with Ralph Nader"
February 25, 2004
"On not believing in John Kerry"
February 19, 2004
February 11, 2004
"Ladies and Gentleman: President Edwards! (After all, he did win South Carolina)"
February 9, 2004
"McNamara: The Sequel"
February 9, 2004
"The fog of cop-out: Robert McNamara 10, Errol Morris 0"
January 28, 2004
"Havoc in the cornfields"
January 20, 2004
"Bush and Iraq: the truth at last"
January 16, 2004
"Bush as Hitler? Let's be fair"
January 8, 2004
Read Articles by Year:
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000