Stupid leaders, useless spies, angry world
April 29, 2004
The stark fact that significant portions of our planet are under the supervision of quite exceptionally stupid and ill-informed people is provoking unwonted expressions of anger and alarm. It is hard to think of people more demure in rhetorical comportment than senior envoys of the United Nations or of the British foreign office. Yet here we have Lakhdar Brahimi, a U.N. undersecretary general and special adviser to Kofi Annan erupting in Baghdad like a soapbox orator.
"There is no doubt," Brahimi told French Inter Radio last week, "that the great poison in the region is this Israeli policy of domination and the suffering imposed on the Palestinians, as well as the perception of all of the population in the region and beyond of the injustice of this policy and the equally unjust support ... of the United States for this policy . There are quite a few other people on this planet, and the Americans should also make an effort to learn how to live with them."
Then, a couple of days later, Brahimi was at it again, this time on ABC, talking to George Stephanopoulos. "I think that there is unanimity in the Arab World, and indeed in much of the rest of the world, that . Israeli policy is brutal, repressive and that they are not interested in peace no matter what you seem to believe in America . What I hear (here in Iraq) is that ... these Americans who are occupying us are the Americans who are giving this blanket support to Israel to do whatever they like. So how can we believe that the Americans want anything good for us?"
Of course there was a tactical motive in both Brahimi's outbursts. As the Baghdad-based executive of the U.N.'s role as after-sales service provider for the United States, Brahimi is trying to establish some street cred with Iraqis as he labors to cobble together a puppet government, with rollout ceremonies scheduled for the end of June. So he can afford to thumb his nose as protests about his indiscretions roll in from New York and Washington, not to mention Tel Aviv.
Brahimi's ripe denunciations were echoed by a squadron of 52 retired British diplomats -- former British ambassadors, high commissioners, governors and senior international officials -- who fired off an unprecedented Striped-Pant Manifesto to Bush's poodle in 10 Downing Street at the start of this week. They denounced Bush's recent endorsement of Sharon's plans as "one-sided and illegal" and as an "abandonment of principle" occurring in the midst of what is "rightly or wrongly . portrayed throughout the Arab and Muslim world as . an illegal and brutal occupation in Iraq." After further withering denunciation of the leadership and conduct of the Coalition in Iraq, the diplomats warned Blair that "there is no case for supporting policies which are doomed to failure."
Anyone questioning the charge that we are enduring exceptionally stupid leaders (with no relief in sight, given John Kerry's recent public statements on the Middle East) need only skip through Bob Woodward's account in his latest respectful Palace handout, "Plan of Attack," of the Bush Administration's march toward the attack on Iraq. There are a few interesting disclosures, such as that my heroine, Laura Bush, was deeply opposed to the war, but the prime impression one carries away from Woodward's airless pages is of a White House utterly secluded from reality. If George Bush had marched out of the front gate into Pennsylvania Avenue, hailed any taxi and asked its driver to give him a briefing on the world situation, he would have done better than with what was served up to him by his staff on a daily basis.
Now, all evidence suggests that Bush doesn't want to hear any briefing that might perturb his fixed opinions. He consults only God and Dick Cheney. But even if the president had ever displayed any unwonted curiosity, it would have remained unslaked. You have only to read the declassified and ridiculous Presidential Daily Briefing of August 6, 2001, on Osama bin Laden to see that. On page after earnest page, Woodward has the president being served up dossiers marked Secret or Top Secret, or being briefed in underground chambers by intelligence officials. It's all rubbish, most aptly resumed in the tremulous pages Woodward allocates to the effort, just as the attack on Iraq was starting to "decapitate" the regime by killing Saddam along with his family.
A CIA officer in the Kurdish zone in northern Iraq has secured, by dint of colossal cash bribes, Iraqi informants inside Saddam's security apparat. Along with the hundreds of thousands of dollars he dispenses on a weekly basis, he gives these informants cellphones. They report that Saddam and his sons are headed for a farm outside Baghdad. They tell him they have paced out the dimensions of a bunker at the farm and relay it to the CIA man, who relays it to CIA headquarters, whence the details are rushed to the White House, whence Bush finally relays the order from Cheney to have F-117s bomb the farm. Graphic descriptions of Saddam being hauled from the debris are duly relayed from the informants. As the CIA officer finds when he inspects the farm, there was no bunker.
On Oct. 2, 2003, The Guardian published an interesting piece by another retired senior British diplomat, Sir Peter Heap, asserting that on his observation in several embassies around the world, the whole system of secret intelligence gathering was pretty much useless as regards the provision of useful information. Year after year he had watched MI6 officers professionally eager to inflate their resourcefulness ladling out off-the-books money to informants with every incentive to inflate their discoveries. Sometimes the MI6 officers would simply copy out stories from the local paper and remit it to London as top-secret information. Nor were electronic intercepts much better.
"Working twice in London on Foreign Office desks dealing with countries at war," Sir Peter wrote, "I saw a flood of intercepts which retrospectively quite often accurately forecast what was about to happen. But since there were countless other intercepted reports that predicted events wrongly, it was virtually impossible to choose in advance the accurate from the false. Moreover, intercepts were usually fairly random and rarely worked when planned." Moral: Reduce America's intelligence agencies to a hundredth of their present size and budget, and tell the spies to become taxi drivers.
There have been stupid, poorly informed leaders throughout history. But seldom, if ever, has the world been afforded, as we are now with the unfolding disasters in Iraq and Israel, the knowledge of this savage stupidity and misinformation on a real-time basis, with absolutely no relief in sight. As the Englishman said when the American asked him to admire the velocity of the water pouring over the Niagara Falls, "What is to stop it?"
Alexander Cockburn is coeditor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2004 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Email this article to a friend
"Ten good groups that need help"
December 29, 2004
"Don't they know it's Christmas? It's moral outrage time!"
December 22, 2004
"Be a hero on 805 percent a year"
December 19, 2004
"Animals don't vote"
December 19, 2004
"Gary Webb and the art of the CIA cover-up"
December 15, 2004
"Politicize the CIA? You've got to be kidding!"
December 1, 2004
"Let them drink sand"
November 23, 2004
"Now for the really bad news"
November 11, 2004
"No silver lining as crows come home"
November 4, 2004
"From Detroit to Baghdad: Intimations of Ed Seitz"
October 27, 2004
"The free speech movement and John Kerry"
October 18, 2004
"'There are no innocents'"
October 8, 2004
"Why Nazis banned Fraktura"
September 28, 2004
"Ralph, go to the West Bank, go to Baghdad!"
September 23, 2004
"The stench of doom"
September 2, 2004
August 26, 2004
"Kerry makes a strong case for Nader"
August 9, 2004
"Presidential elections 2004: Not as big a deal as they say"
August 9, 2004
July 28, 2004
"Nader and the conspiracy of silence"
July 22, 2004
"Boston awaits dead party"
July 14, 2004
"Venezuela: the gang's all here!"
June 25, 2004
"Reagan in truth and fiction"
June 10, 2004
"Kerry gives CPR to stricken prez"
May 27, 2004
"The empire, seen from Oceanside"
May 21, 2004
"Greenlights for torture"
May 13, 2004
"Torture: as American as apple pie"
May 5, 2004
"Stupid leaders, useless spies, angry world"
April 29, 2004
"Clouds loom over Kerry challenge"
April 22, 2004
"Bush, Kerry and empire"
April 19, 2004
"Pulitzers and Prozac"
April 8, 2004
"Gay marriage: a step back in freedom's faltering march"
March 16, 2004
"Understanding the world with Paul Sweezy"
March 10, 2004
"The uproar over Nader"
March 3, 2004
"Winning with Ralph Nader"
February 25, 2004
"On not believing in John Kerry"
February 19, 2004
February 11, 2004
"Ladies and Gentleman: President Edwards! (After all, he did win South Carolina)"
February 9, 2004
"McNamara: The Sequel"
February 9, 2004
"The fog of cop-out: Robert McNamara 10, Errol Morris 0"
January 28, 2004
"Havoc in the cornfields"
January 20, 2004
"Bush and Iraq: the truth at last"
January 16, 2004
"Bush as Hitler? Let's be fair"
January 8, 2004
Read Articles by Year:
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000