 |
Sat Oct 11 2008 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
Departments Election Issues Exactly how the good guys finally won by David Swanson October 2, 2007 The leaders of today's Congress have made clear through numerous lobby visits that unless we can produce polls that show congressional elections in November 2008 hang on the question of impeachment, nobody's going to be impeached. Bush and Cheney can continue to ignore subpoenas, spy illegally, kidnap, torture, murder, and rewrite laws. They can launch another illegal war. They can rig the elections. They could barbeque babies on the White House lawn. It doesn't matter. They will not be impeached. Never mind the whole question of whether future presidents and vice presidents will be expected to obey any laws. It's all about elections. The Democrats played this same game when Reagan was investigated in the Iran Contra scandal. The Democrats exercised restraint. In the end, they restrained themselves right into a defeat and created the Bush dynasty. But things were handled differently in 1973. The Democrats made impeachment an issue. In fact, they made it THE issue. And the polls spoke loudly and clearly to congress members of both parties. Some Democrats, such as Illinois Congressman Dan Rostenkowski, started out adamantly opposed to impeachment. But they were pretty easily brought around. The Majority Leader was a Democrat who saw being a Democrat as something noticeably different from being a Republican. His name was Tip O'Neill, and his role in the impeachment of President Richard Nixon is highlighted in Jimmy Breslin's "How the Good Guys Finally Won." Here's are key passages: __________ [O'Neill] came into this room in June with a new weapon, another mirror, a forty-page notebook put together by William Hamilton and Staff, pollsters, for William Welsh of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The topic sentence of the report said, "In April our study shows 43 per cent will vote for a Congressman who is inclined to vote for impeachment; 29 per cent would vote for a Congressman who would not be so inclined and 28 per cent feel the Congressman's stand on impeachment would make no difference at this time." A further interpretation of the figures showed that "50 per cent of Republican voters will vote against a Congressman who is inclined not to vote for impeachment, while only 7 per cent of Democrats will vote for a Congressman who is inclined to vote against impeachment." ... O'Neill went right up to Rostenkowski, because Rostenkowski is Mayor Daley's play caller with the Illinois Democrats in Congress. A word from Danny is a word from the Hall. Deviation? Try Russia, not Cook County. "Danny, ol pal, did you see this poll yet?" Tip O'Neill said. "What poll?" Rostenkowski grumbled. He despises polls, but he had to ask about a poll because he is in politics and he is supposed to ask about a poll. "It shows here that we could pick up as many as eighty seats the way it's going now," O'Neill said. "Whew." "And it shows here that there is no way for a Congressman in an urban district to win an election against anybody if he doesn't vote for impeachment." "Where does it show that?" "Here, look. Only seven percent of the Democrats will vote for a Congressman who is against impeachment. That means a Republican could beat a Democrat in a city if the Republican is for impeachment and the Democrat is against it. Can you imagine that? Say, that's right. You represent a city, don't you, Danny?" O'Neill began to show the poll around. He told Thaddeus Dulski, who comes from upstate Erie County in New York, that the poll showed all rural votes being lost to a Congressman who is against impeachment. "But you don't have any farms in your district," he told Dulski. Dulski grumbled. He had a religious belief in the presidency. He also had a lot of farmers in his district. Out on the House floor, when O'Neill saw Angelo Roncallo, a Long Island Republican, he said, "Hey, Angie, old pal. Geez, but you really love it down here, don't you? Angie, I want you to know something. My door is always open to you, as you know. And to show you how much I think of you, Angie, my door is still going to be open to you next year when you're not going to be in Congress because of this impeachment." O'Neill gave a great, fun laugh. Roncallo laughed with him but not as much. ___________ Here's the part where your history teacher says: Compare and Contrast. The first thing you'll notice is that it was all about the damn elections back then, just the same as it is now. But somehow the Democrats saw winning the elections as dependent on doing their jobs, and in fact they won the biggest victories in many years and have never done as well since. The second thing you'll notice is that just about everything else was completely different. Elections were losable for incumbents. The Democrats had started impeachment proceedings and made it an issue before the polls compelled them to. The media covered the story. The polling companies did the polls and published them. A labor union was pushing impeachment. And a Congressional leader was lobbying his colleagues in the direction of impeachment. Those six facts appear today to have come from some bizarre parallel universe. Yet, if we are dedicated to saving this republic, we will endeavor to find a way to substitute for them. We will recruit pro-impeachment challengers to incumbents. We will use civil disobedience, media activism, and legal bribery to lobby Congress as hard as possible to take up impeachment. We will organize in swing districts and commission polls in them. We will report the results on progressive radio and the internet. And we will focus every tool we have on Nancy Pelosi. If we lose now, the good guys won't have won much thirty years ago. Email this article to a friend |
Don't forget to check out articles from 2007 and 2008
"Nonviolent resisters put Senator Clinton on notice"
December 23, 2007
Pete Perry
"In-depth, post-EVEREST interview with Ohio's Secretary of State"
December 21, 2007
Brad Friedman
"The phrase that could defeat Hillary Clinton"
December 19, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"Ohio will likely face big vote-counting problems in 2008"
December 19, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
""Critical security failures" leads Ohio Sec. of State to recommend ban of DRE (touch-screen) voting machines"
December 17, 2007
Brad Friedman
"Ohio Secretary of State confirms 2004 election could have been stolen"
December 14, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Kucinich first, Edwards second in PDA straw poll"
December 7, 2007
Tim Carpenter
"Hillary and the politics of disappointment"
December 2, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"Voting can be a real battle for U.S. troops and others overseas in the 2008 primaries"
December 2, 2007
Loretta (Laurie) Ahlrich
"Wolf Blitzer loses Democratic debate"
November 20, 2007
David Swanson
"Another Clinton campaign fraud"
November 15, 2007
David Swanson
"We remember… Nov. 2 memorial anniversary of the 2004 Ohio election"
November 6, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"The weak slat under the bed of democracy"
October 31, 2007
Michael Winship
"Aurora Dairy exemption from check-off program challenged; USDA should demand retroactive payment from faux organic milk producers"
October 31, 2007
Mark Kastel
"Kucinich tops other Dem Presidential leaders in key CA straw poll"
October 30, 2007
David Swanson
"Will the GOP election theft machine do it again in 2008?"
October 19, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Exactly how the good guys finally won"
October 2, 2007
David Swanson
"Voter purging: a legal way for Republicans to swing elections?"
September 16, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"Why doesn't the GOP want Ohio's voting machines tested?"
September 11, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"The Cat in the Hat, elusive happy endings, and the [election] mess that is so big, and so deep, and so tall"
September 9, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews
"The Death of the DRE: gone the way of Lawn Jarts"
September 3, 2007
Christopher Wilson
"Fooled Again series: exclusive interview with Michael Collins"
September 1, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews
"Fooled again series: exclusive interview with "Diebold whistleblower" Steve Heller"
August 27, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, Voting Integrity editor, OpEdNews
"The Dan Rather voting machine special, a recipe for election disaster, and serious food for thought"
August 24, 2007
Joan Brunwasser
"Resistance of one"
August 10, 2007
David Swanson
"The dog ate my homework continues: inter-office Ohio Board of Elections email prompted by SAVE THE BALLOTS website gives a glimpse into the attitudes of Ohio election officials"
August 9, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"Look at who runs our boards of elections"
August 9, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
"Restore health to America's elections and pull the plug on SDD virus threat"
August 8, 2007
Michael Richardson
"Paper ballots for California: Secretary of State announces de-certification/re-certification plans for e-voting systems"
August 4, 2007
Brad Friedman from Plano, TX, with help from Emily Levy of VelvetRevolution.us and Tom Courbat of SAVE R VOTE
"The dog ate my homework"
August 3, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips and Patricia "Paddy" Shaffer
"Welcome to jail for destruction of election records… for some of the ladies and gentlemen of the Ohio Boards of Elections!"
August 3, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"The criminal cover-up of Ohio's stolen 2004 election sinks to the fraudulent, the absurd, the pathetic"
August 2, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Part II – Squire v. Geer: Facts the Magistrate left out are even more shocking than the ones he included"
July 30, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Will Bush cancel the 2008 election?"
July 30, 2007
Harvey Wasserman & Bob Fitrakis
"Ohio's 2004 presidential election records missing or destroyed"
July 30, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"Sausage making and electronic voting machines"
July 27, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Shreds of evidence"
July 26, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.
"Missing records and record access in Ohio, July 2007"
July 25, 2007
Paddy Shaffer
"On-site observations of the hand-counting of paper ballots and recommendations for the general election of 2008"
July 24, 2007
Sheila Parks
"Sicko ?"
July 3, 2007
Joan Brunwasser, OpEdNews
"John Edwards supports "open source" for voting systems"
June 27, 2007
Alan Dechert
"Will electronic voting reform create new ways to steal elections?"
June 6, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld
"US Attorney resigns following Conyers’ request for BBC documents"
June 2, 2007
Greg Palast
"Will Al Gore face his inconvenient truths about our stolen elections?"
May 18, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Giving the voters "poisoned food" to "nourish" democracy"
May 17, 2007
Marj Creech
"In the land of the free, and the home of the brave"
May 17, 2007
Paul R. Lehto
"The globalization of electronic election theft"
May 11, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"RFK: Rove and Rove's brain, 'Should be in jail,' not in office"
May 9, 2007
Greg Palast
"Introducing Psephos"
April 25, 2007
Paul R. Lehto
"Are Rove's missing e-mails the smoking guns of the stolen 2004 election?"
April 25, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"The GOP's cyber election hit squad"
April 22, 2007
Steven Rosenfeld and Bob Fitrakis
"Another path to peace: the case for Kucinich"
April 19, 2007
David Swanson
"Virtual election season"
April 16, 2007
David Swanson
"Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett"
April 16, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett"
April 15, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Auditing the mid-term election"
April 6, 2007
Richard Hayes Phillips
"Two big victories boost Ohio's election protection movement"
April 5, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"More potential 2004 election illegalities rock Ohio's Hocking County as Cleveland braces for a legal firestorm"
March 30, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"New Ohio evidence exposes apparently illegal 2004 recount activity by Hocking County's GOP Election Director, and a stinging complaint is filed in Cleveland"
March 26, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Explosive new vote fraud developments continue to rock Ohio and Florida"
March 23, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Forced resignations and stiff prison sentences intensify the escalating blowback from Ohio's 2004 stolen election"
March 20, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Election fraud, my ass"
March 16, 2007
Paul Rogat Loeb
"After Ohio's recount rigging convictions in Cuyahoga, is Coshocton County next?"
March 6, 2007
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
"Florida setting example"
March 3, 2007
Free Press staff
"Sequoia Voting Systems contract with San Francisco needs added section to ensure transparency"
February 13, 2007
Brent Turner, Open Voting Consortium
"Ohio's spreading stolen 2004 election scandal claims another victim"
February 10, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"First criminal convictions from Ohio's stolen 2004 election confirm recount was rigged"
January 27, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"Election attorneys amplify importance of convictions for recount rigging in Ohio 2004 presidential race"
January 26, 2007
Paul Lehto
"Do new Ohio recount prosecutions indicate unraveling of 2004 election theft cover-up?"
January 19, 2007
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
"The mystic voting hall: for the love of democracy"
January 5, 2007
Sheri Myers
"DREs, magic and other sleights of hand"
January 4, 2007
Rady Ananda
Read Articles by Year:
2007 2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001 2000
All content © 1970-2008
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer