The Free Press: Speaking Truth to Power Fri Mar 12 2010
Departments
Election Issues

Recount fictions in Virginia's Fifth
by David Swanson
November 9, 2008

As of about 9 p.m. ET on Thursday, 316,476 votes had been counted in Virginia's Fifth District congressional race between incumbent bigotted xenophobe Virgil Goode and challenger Tom Perriello, with 158,562 going to Perriello and 157,914 to Goode, for a difference of 648 votes or 0.2 percent of the total.

According to a report on Charlottesville's NBC-29:
    "There is no 'automatic' or 'mandatory' recount. If the results differ by one percent or less, the losing candidate can formally request a recount in court. If the difference is less than half of a percentage point, the same candidate still has to make a request and the state will pay for it."
Two years ago Mr. Macaca, George Allen, lost a close senate race in Virginia, the last great Virginian rejection of racism before the defeat of McCain-Palin and the possible defeat of Goode. Allen chose not to request a recount. His campaign or supporters of it had engaged in widespread suppression tactics, including misleading calls and flyers and intimidation. It's possible that he preferred to avoid close scrutiny of the election because of how deep his dirty tricks ran. Or maybe he just decided he couldn't win. If Goode loses the initial count this time and chooses not to recount, the same question will haunt us. If Perriello loses the initial count, only requesting a recount would fit with the statements he has recently made about the importance of taking the time to be sure every vote is counted. But then, he is working with the Democratic Party which absolutely loves to concede, so anything's possible.

The interesting question is, if they do a recount, what in the world will the recounters do in order to maintain the charade that they are "recounting" something? I ask this not because I distrust the people doing the recount in any way, but because there simply isn't anything to recount. Most of the votes were cast on DRE machines, electronic machines. Unlike voting on a paper ballot, voting on a DRE does not leave behind any item that can be counted or recounted. The same NBC-29 story explains:
    "If and when a recount occurs, it's different every time. According to Iachetta, electronic ballots can be 're-counted' by re-reading the cards that hold the results or just by going over the statement of results again."
Even NBC was forced to put "re-counted" in quotes. The votes exist, if they exist, inside a machine. The machine spits out a number, and we all simply have to trust it. If the machine can be made to spit out a different number, that would be interesting, but it wouldn't help anything, because we'd have no basis on which to guess whether the first or second number was closer to an accurate count.

Now it could be discovered that some of the counts are impossible or improbable (machines have sometimes given candidates in various parts of the country more votes than there were voters, or reported that huge numbers of voters chose to vote in a local race and ignore a national one, etc.) Or it could be shown that a machine had been suspiciously tampered with, or that the data had been altered by an interested party. Or some innocent human error in processing the totals could be found. But aside from those possibilities, assuming everything seems to have worked perfectly, we actually have no possible way of knowing whether a machine count is accurate or not. As far as I know we have no exit polls here to help us either.

This probably means a couple of things. First, it probably means that a "recount" is not going to change the results dramatically, since most of the votes can't be recounted. Second, it might just mean that more people in Virginia come to grips with the need to replace our misguided techno-fetish for dysfunctional machines with paper ballots publicly counted at every polling place. In fact the Virginia Constitution requires the public counting of ballots, and DREs can't do that.

Now, some of the ballots in this contested race are paper. I voted early on a paper absentee ballot, as did a lot of other people, and others voted on provisional ballots on election day. All of those ballots could be carefully recounted by hand and the totals made public for each polling place. In most places, paper ballots are counted on optical scan machines, which are notoriously as unreliable as DREs, even when they aren't being jammed by wet ballots as happened in some parts of Virginia on Tuesday. The advantage of optical scan counting is that it leaves behind the paper ballots, which can be counted by hand if needed. But check out this report from the same NBC-29 story:
    "Paper ballots will most likely go through a tabulating machine again."
Are they serious? If the ballots are counted by hand in small numbers locally, and the totals posted publicly and added together, a count can be extremely reliable. If the ballots are counted by a machine, and the total comes out different from last time, which total do you use?

Other factors could come into play here, including late arriving absentee ballots or attempts by Goode's team to disqualify various people's provisional ballots. There is some chance, I think, that this will help wake us up to the need for universal registration. If we didn't make everyone jump through so many hoops in order to vote, and simply let everyone vote in the same way that we let everyone have a Social Security number, then scary tales about Mickey Mouse showing up at the polls wouldn't be taken seriously even on Fox News.

When the first count is finished, if either the winner or the loser has any suspicion that a recount could come closer to the truth, then they have a duty to insist on it, and to insist that it be taken seriously and done with the extreme care that we put into counting money or sports scores. Sadly, we just don't have an electoral system that will allow any of us to be sure of the outcome no matter how many times they "recount" it.


Email this article to a friend




1240 Bryden Road Columbus, Ohio 43209 Ph/Fx 614.253.2571 Email truth@freepress.org
  

Don't forget to check out articles from 2009 and 2010

Election Issues

"Why Al Franken should NOT be riding private planes"
  December 23, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"The suspicious, disturbing death of election rigger Michael Connell"
  December 20, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Last US House seat filled on grave of stolen 2004 election"
  December 9, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"What happened this year in Ohio"
  December 1, 2008
  Pete Johnson

"Imaginary numbers persist in our presidential elections"
  November 22, 2008
  Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.

"The GOP attack on democracy continues in Ohio"
  November 19, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"The 2008 Presidential election: a preliminary analysis"
  November 19, 2008
  Richard Hayes Phillips, Ph.D.

"Election protection in Ohio (and America) isn't over"
  November 17, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Recount fictions in Virginia's Fifth"
  November 9, 2008
  David Swanson

"The Pits: Georgia's GOP swipes the Peach State"
  November 6, 2008
  Greg Palast

"Grant Park on Election Night"
  November 5, 2008
  Joan Brunwasser

"Can the grassroots Internet-based election protection movement win the White House?"
  November 3, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"How and why I just voted"
  November 2, 2008
  David Swanson

"No time for Nader: A letter to Nader McKinney voters"
  November 2, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"'Vote stealing imperils democracy': former Montague resident charges election manipulation"
  November 2, 2008
  Richie Davis

"Will this Presidential election be stolen? It didn’t happen by chance..."
  November 2, 2008
  Channing Redditt and Amy Maldonado

"The time has come"
  October 30, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Beware the Twin Towers of electronic election theft "
  October 30, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

"Sarah Palin and the new Apostolic reformation"
  October 28, 2008
  Russ Bellant

"Antidotes to complacency: four reasons to act"
  October 28, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Redesigning democracy"
  October 22, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"A McCain "win" will be theft: resistance is planned"
  October 21, 2008
  David Swanson

"Critical US Supreme Court ruling against Rovian GOP vote meddling may prove temporary"
  October 20, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Our national juncture"
  October 17, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Suppression"
  October 17, 2008
  Joe Rothstein

"Cuyahoga's witch hunt"
  October 13, 2008
  Victoria Lovegren, Ph.D.

"Videos from Ohio Election Protection Conference"
  October 12, 2008
  Free Press Staff

"The Palin-Biden debate: high time to move beyond clichés"
  October 11, 2008
  Ramzy Baroud

"Struggle: A Documentary"
  October 10, 2008
  Roger Hill

"GOP attacks on American voters turn desperate, ugly and dangerous"
  October 10, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

"Warming to Palin"
  October 8, 2008
  David Swanson

"Brace yourself"
  October 8, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Cindy, Charlotte, and our Constitution"
  October 8, 2008
  David Swanson

"Rainbow PUSH Coalition registers 2090 new voters this week"
  October 6, 2008
  Lauren Love

"Big presidential vote count error found and fixed in New Mexico"
  October 6, 2008
  Steven Rosenfeld

"Ohio 2008 opens with a subpoena, a surge and calls for election protection"
  October 1, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"North Carolina: The new Ohio?"
  September 30, 2008
  Christopher Bifani

"Foreign policy debate all about war"
  September 29, 2008
  David Swanson

"Be a poll worker and save American democracy"
  September 26, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Why hurricane Ike demands paper ballots on November 4"
  September 17, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Death becomes her: let's make her our president"
  September 15, 2008
  Jason Miller

"Ten ways the McCain/Palin GOP is now stealing the Ohio vote"
  September 9, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"John McCain: Morally, mentally, and emotionally unfit"
  September 8, 2008
  Jim Fetzer

"Logical consequences"
  September 4, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Rovian politics chose Sarah Palin"
  September 3, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Shocking choice by John McCain "
  August 31, 2008
  Robert Dewey

"Ron Paul endorsement of Don Young "shocking and disappointing""
  August 27, 2008
  Richard A. Viguerie

"The DNC platform: belief you can change in"
  August 10, 2008
  David Swanson

"Obama doesn't sweat. He should."
  July 29, 2008
  Greg Palast

"Reverend Jesse L. Jackson, Sr. applauds Sen. Obama’s speech before the NAACP"
  July 16, 2008
  Reverend Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.

"Three key ways YOU can help protect the 2008 election"
  July 3, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Colleges, voter registration, and a historic opportunity: a more detailed proposal"
  June 19, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Obama must learn from Kucinich's election theft impeachment"
  June 11, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Clinton only needs 153% of remaining delegates"
  June 1, 2008
  David Swanson

"The buried Florida story: why campaigning matters"
  May 31, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"The myth of Clinton's popular vote lead"
  May 29, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Did the Limbaugh effect also flip Michigan?"
  May 29, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Edwards just put Obama over the top"
  May 15, 2008
  David Swanson

"Did the Limbaugh effect also flip Michigan?"
  May 14, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Obama-Clinton funny math: Guam update"
  May 4, 2008
  David Swanson

"Did the US Supreme Court deliver the Indiana Primary to Hillary Clinton?"
  May 2, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Did the US Supreme Court just elect John McCain?"
  April 30, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"The 2008 election will be stolen"
  April 19, 2008
  David Swanson

"The done deal"
  April 18, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Letter to Hillary: remember when John McCain slimed your daughter"
  April 17, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Fire and race"
  April 3, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Keep the Republic"
  March 27, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"What it's all about..."
  March 25, 2008
  Sheila Samples

"Can SuperDelegates stop the scorched earth campaigning?"
  March 24, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"An election without meaning"
  March 23, 2008
  Peter Phillips

"We have a dream"
  March 23, 2008
  Phil Tajitsu Nash

"Hope, change, and pissing in the wind: "Of Obama, Democrats, and the Power Elite""
  March 19, 2008
  Patrice Greanville and Jason Miller

"Ohio's voting machines are now an official crime scene"
  March 17, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

"Did Republicans give Hillary her victory in Ohio?"
  March 8, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Primary day at the polls in Columbus, Ohio"
  March 5, 2008
  David S. Lewis, National Affairs Editor

"Obama & Clinton: who's more likely to confront global warming?"
  March 4, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"If you think Karl Rove is evil, make phone calls today"
  March 4, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Obama's talking points"
  March 1, 2008
  Gregg Gordon

"Adventures in inaudible audio with Senator Barack Obama"
  February 27, 2008
  David S. Lewis, National Affairs Editor

"Attention all voters: this is a must-see video"
  February 26, 2008
  Free Press staff

"On the campaign trail in the Buckeye State stalking the candidates: John McCain"
  February 24, 2008
  David S. Lewis, National Affairs Editor

"Will Clinton's advisors tell her the hard truths?"
  February 22, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"How much damage will Clinton do before she folds?"
  February 22, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"The Hillary nutcracker"
  February 21, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Behind Obama's wave of victories: the more they know him….."
  February 17, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Hillary's hawks -- How Obama's and Clinton's advisors mirror their stands on the war"
  February 11, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb, introducing a Stephen Zunes article

"Poll shows John McCain faces tough road in gaining conservative support"
  February 11, 2008
  Richard A. Viguerie

"The Obama Factors"
  February 11, 2008
  Todd Huffman

"Vote against Clinton"
  February 4, 2008
  David Swanson

"Why this Edwards voter Is now backing Obama"
  February 2, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Liveblogging Obama v. Clinton v. CNN"
  February 1, 2008
  David Swanson

"It's all about Hillary, not her party"
  January 29, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"The South Carolina you won't see on CNN - South Carolina primary colors: black and white?"
  January 26, 2008
  Greg Palast

"The South Carolina you won't see on CNN - South Carolina primary colors: black and white?"
  January 26, 2008
  Greg Palast

"Conspiracy theorist"
  January 24, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Hillary Clinton's sleaze parade "
  January 20, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Bob & Harvey's 3-Step "Ohio Plan" for fair and reliable voting and vote counts"
  January 16, 2008
  Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

"Media misses story: Obedwards wins New Hampshire"
  January 11, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Primary concerns"
  January 10, 2008
  Robert C. Koehler

"Clear evidence of widespread vote fraud in New Hampshire"
  January 10, 2008
  Paul Joseph Watson

"The Kudzu Effect: The Voting-Industrial Complex chokes our democracy"
  January 6, 2008
  Sheri Myers, Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman

"Still true to ObEdwards: Why I keep donating to both Edwards and Obama"
  January 6, 2008
  Paul Rogat Loeb

"Clinton campaign office re-occupied by peace activists on day of Iowa voting"
  January 4, 2008
  Mike Ferner




Read Articles by Year:
2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000




All content © 1970-2010
The Columbus Free Press
Disclaimer