Why Anything that the Financially-compromised CDC says About Anything, Especially the Current Coronavirus “Pandemic”, Must be Taken With a Giant Grain of Salt

(That is, as long as the agency denies its decades of serious conflicts of interest and also continues to be subservient to the nefarious, hidden economic interests of Big Pharma Corporations like Roche and Regeneron and Billionaire Wall Street Oligarchs like Bill Gates)

 

By Gary G. Kohls, MD, Utilizing the Writings of Neil Z. Miller and Jeanne Lenzer – 2016 (955 words)

 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Protecting the Private Good?

 

By Jeanne Lenzer, Associate Editor, The British Medical Journal, USA – May 15, 2015

 

BMJ 2015; 350 - https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2362

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) includes the following disclaimer with its recommendations: “CDC, our planners, and our content experts wish to disclose they have no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products... The CDC does not accept commercial support.”

 

The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law.

 

Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars (annually) in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.

 

Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, told theBMJ, “The CDC has enormous credibility among physicians, in no small part because the agency is generally thought to be free of industry bias. Financial dealings with biopharmaceutical companies threaten that reputation.”

 

Industry funding of the CDC has taken many doctors, even some who worked for CDC, by surprise.

 

Philip Lederer, an infectious diseases fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, and a former CDC epidemic intelligence service officer, told The BMJ he was “saddened” to learn of industry funding.

 

The CDC’s director, Tom Frieden, did not respond to a question about the disclaimer.

 

Frieden told The BMJ by email, “Public-private partnerships allow CDC to do more, faster. The agency’s core values of accountability, respect, and integrity guide the way CDC spends the funds entrusted to it. When possible conflicts of interests arise, we take a hard, …

(SNIP)

 

Ed. Note: The remainder of this article has been protected by a paywall that would cost any prospective reader 37 US dollars to have access for only a 24-hour period!!

 

Fortunately, Neil A. Miller, the author of “Miller’s Review of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Papers Summarized for Parents and Researchers” has done the hard work of examining the above abbreviated, censored-out article that puts the US CDC in a very unfavorable light, especially now – while the world’s innocent and unaware soon-to be victims of a fascist, totalitarian Medical Martial Law (with police-enforced, very profitable vaccinations of the entire population, with no regard to medical contraindications) and a highly likely Severe Recession and subsequent Great Depression that could approximate the famous one that followed the Wall Street Stock Market Crash of 1929.

 

These dire consequences are likely to occur because of the so-called “Coronavirus Pandemic” - with the leadership of the co-opted CDC, FDA, NIH, HHS and DHS (all with some sort of conflict of interest with Big Pharma and the corporate Oligarchs) mis-leading the nation into risking hundreds of thousands of un-necessary bankruptcies and lay-offs and starvations and homelessness and suicides by repeatedly acquiescing to their Big Pharma controllers by consistently refusing to allow any discussion of the potentially curative and preventive effects of nutrient/vitamin therapy for viral illnesses, which would have effectively and affordably competed with the disease-producing, highly toxic, over-vaccination agendas of bureaucratic entities such as the CDC, the AAP, the AMA, the AAFP, etc, etc.

 

Hence the following summary of the above British Medical Journal article that Miller published just a few years ago (page 313). Miller titled the page thusly:

 

The CDC Receives Money from The Pharmaceutical Industry that Influences Decisions it Makes About the Public Welfare

 

Here is Miller’s summary of the 2015 BMJ article, starting with this quote:

 

“The CDC’s image as an independent watchdog over the public health has given it enormous prestige, and its recommendations are occasionally enforced by law. Despite the agency’s disclaimer, the CDC does receive millions of dollars in industry gifts and funding, both directly and indirectly, and several recent CDC actions and recommendations have raised questions about the science it cites, the clinical guidelines it promotes, and the money it is taking.”

 

The CDC claims that it has no financial dealings with the manufacturers of commercial products but this is not true.

 

In 1992, Congress passed legislation that created the non-profit CDC Foundation to encourage relationships between the CDC and industry. Pharmaceutical companies donate to the CDC Foundation.

 

The CDC receives millions of dollars annually in “conditional funding” from corporations and the CDC Foundation. The CDC uses conditional funds to oversee controversial recommendations and studies. Corporations can punish the CDC if it conducts research that affects their profits.

 

Industry funding inserts bias into treatment recommendations and study results which is unacceptable for a public health agency.

 

The CDC has a systemic lack of oversight of its ethics program.

 

The CDC’s high credibility among physicians would be threatened if they learned that it takes money from pharmaceutical companies.

 

The fact that the CDC takes money from industry cannot be fixed by asking the CDC to be more ethical and avoid conflicts of interest. US Legislators caused this problem and can make new laws to fix the problem (GGK note: that is, if most legislators weren’t also “owned’ by Big Pharma and other Wall Street interests).

_______________________________________________________________________

 

2] Mass Panic may be Worse Than the Virus Itself

 

By Dr. Abdu Sharkawy, Infectious Disease Specialist - University of Toronto (617 words)

 

https://www.providencejournal.com/opinion/20200310/dr-abdu-sharkawy-my-turn-mass-panic-may-be-worse-than-virus-itself

I am not scared of Covid-19, but I am scared about the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic.” – Dr. Sharkawy,

 

The coronavirus is here. But fear not.

 

Mass panic is also here. Fear.

 

I’m a doctor and an infectious diseases specialist. I’ve been at this for more than 20 years seeing sick patients on a daily basis. I have worked in inner-city hospitals and in the poorest slums of Africa.

 

HIV-AIDS, Hepatitis, TB, SARS, measles, shingles, whooping cough, diphtheria ... there is little I haven’t been exposed to in my profession. And with the notable exception of SARS, very little has left me feeling vulnerable, overwhelmed or downright scared.

 

I am not scared of COVID-19. I am concerned about the implications of a novel infectious agent that has spread the world over and continues to find new footholds in different soil. I am rightly concerned for the welfare of those who are elderly, in frail health or disenfranchised who stand to suffer mostly, and disproportionately, at the hands of this new scourge. But I am not scared of COVID-19.

 

What I am scared about is the loss of reason and wave of fear that has induced the masses of society into a spellbinding spiral of panic, stockpiling obscene quantities of anything that could fill a bomb shelter adequately in a post-apocalyptic world.

 

I am scared of the N95 masks that are stolen from hospitals and urgent care clinics where they are actually needed for frontline health-care providers and instead are being donned in airports, malls and coffee lounges, perpetuating even more fear and suspicion of others. I am scared that our hospitals will be overwhelmed with anyone who thinks they “probably don’t have it but may as well get checked out no matter what because you just never know ...” and those with heart failure, emphysema, pneumonia and strokes will pay the price for overfilled ER waiting rooms with only so many doctors and nurses to assess.

 

I am scared that travel restrictions will become so far reaching that weddings will be canceled, graduations missed and family reunions will not materialize. And well, even that big party called the Olympic Games ... that could be kiboshed, too.

 

Can you even imagine?

 

I’m scared those same epidemic fears will limit trade, harm partnerships in multiple sectors, business and otherwise, and ultimately culminate in a global recession.

 

But mostly, I’m scared about what message we are telling our kids when faced with a threat.

 

Instead of reason, rationality, open-mindedness and altruism, we are telling them to panic, be fearful, suspicious, reactionary and self-interested.

 

COVID-19 is nowhere near over. It will be coming to a city, a hospital, a friend, even a family member near you at some point. Expect it. Stop waiting to be surprised further. The fact is the virus itself will not likely do much harm when it arrives. But our own behaviors and “fight for yourself above all else” attitude could prove disastrous.

 

I implore you all. Temper fear with reason, panic with patience and uncertainty with education.

 

We have an opportunity to learn a great deal about health hygiene and limiting the spread of innumerable transmissible diseases in our society. Let’s meet this challenge together in the best spirit of compassion for others, patience, and above all, an unfailing effort to seek truth, facts and knowledge as opposed to conjecture, speculation and catastrophizing.

 

Facts not fear. Clean hands. Open hearts.

 

Our children will thank us for it.

_____________________________________________________________________________________

 

3] Henry Kissinger — The Man Behind Eugenics and Depopulation

 

Eugenics and Depopulation: A Hidden NeoConservative Point of View Shared by Bill Gates

 

By Alexander Light – October 12, 2018 (1012 words)

 

https://humansarefree.com/2018/10/henry-kissinger-the-man-behind-eugenics-and-depopulation.html

 

“Depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World.”Dr Henry Kissinger, believed by millions around the world to be one of the single most evil individuals still living, or to have ever lived

 

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeldhas been proposing, funding and building Bio-Weapons Level 3 and Level 4 labs at many places around the U.S., even on university campuses and in densely populated urban locations.In a Bio-Weapons Level 4 facility, a single bacteria or virus is lethal. Bio-Weapons Level 4 is the highest level legally allowed in the continental U.S.”

-Alexander Light

 

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels”-- Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund, quoted in “Are You Ready for Our New Age Future?”

 

 

 

Depopulation, also known as Eugenics, was proposed under the Nazis during World War II. It is the deliberate killing off of large segments of living populations and was proposed for Third World countries under President Carter’s administration by the National Security Council’s Ad Hoc Group on Population Policy.

 

National Security Council (NSC) Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled “Implications of world-wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests,” says:

“Dr. Kissinger proposed in his memorandum to the NSC that ‘depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World’.”

 

He quoted reasons of national security, and because (t)he U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries … Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of U.S.

 

Depopulation policy became the top priority under the NSC agenda, Club of Rome and U.S. policymakers like Gen. Alexander Haig, Cyrus Vance, Ed Muskie and Kissinger.

 

According to an NSC spokesman at the time, the United States shared the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the “population crisis” is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than nuclear annihilation.

 

In 1975, Kissinger established a policy-planning group in the U.S. State Department’s Office of Population Affairs. The depopulation “GLOBAL 2000” document for President Jimmy Carter was prepared.

 

It is no surprise that this policy was established under President Carter with help from Kissinger and Brzezinski — all with ties toDavid Rockefeller. 

 

The Bush family, the Harriman family – the Wall Street business partners of Bush in financing Hitler - and the Rockefeller family are the elite of the American Eugenics movement. Even Prince Philip of Britain, a member of the Bilderberg group, is in favor of depopulation:

“If I were re-incarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”Prince Philip Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund, quoted in “Are You Ready for Our New Age Future?” (Insiders Report, American Policy Center, December 1995).

 

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeldhas been proposing, funding and building Bio-Weapons Level 3 and Level 4 labs at many places around the U.S. even on university campuses and in densely populated urban locations.

 

In a Bio-Weapons Level 4 facility, a single bacteria or virus is lethal. Bio-Weapons Level 4 is the highest level legally allowed in the continental U.S.

 

For what purpose are these labs being developed, and who will make the decisions on where bio-weapons created in these facilities will be used and on whom?

 

More than 20 world-class microbiologists have been murdered since 2002, mostly in the U.S. and the UK. Nearly all were working on development of ethnic-specific bio-weapons.

 

Citizens around the U.S. are frantically filing lawsuits to stop these labs on campuses and in communities where they live.

 

Despite the opposition of residents living near UC Davis, where a Bio-Weapons Level 4 lab was planned, it had the support of the town’s mayor.

 

She suddenly reversed her position after a monkey escaped from a high security primate facility on the campus where the bio-weapons lab was proposed. Residents claimed that if UC Davis could not keep monkeys from escaping from their cages, they certainly could not guarantee that a single virus or bacteria would not escape from a test tube. The AWOL monkey killed the project.

 

Population is a political problem. The extreme secrecy surrounding the takeover of nuclear weapons, NASA and the space program and the development of numerous bio-weapons labs is a threat to civil society, especially in the hands of the military and corporations.

 

The fascist application of all three of these programs can be used to achieve established U.S. government depopulation policy goals, which may eliminate 2 billion of the world’s existing population through war, famine, disease and any other methods necessary.

 

Two excellent examples of existing U.S. depopulation policy are, first, the long-term impact on the civilian population from Agent Orange in Vietnam, where the Rockefellers built oil refineries and aluminum plants during the Vietnam War. 

 

The second is the permanent contamination of the Middle East and Central Asia with Depleted Uranium, which, unfortunately, will destroy the genetic future of the populations living in those regions and will also have a global effect already reflected in increases in infant mortality reported in the U.S., Europe, and the UK.

 

 

 

 

This lower image is courtesy of my friend, Dr James Fetzer, from his long article, entitled “The Coronavirus Phenomenon is a Political Pandemic, not a Medical Emergency”. Please read it at:

https://jamesfetzer.org/2020/03/jim-fetzer-the-coronavirus-phenomenon-is-a-political-pandemic-not-a-medical-emergency/

(Note that the quote’s accuracy is disputed by a fact checker website that is run by a website that is funded by notorious NeoConservative entities that would surely try to protect the legacy of fellow NeoCon Kissinger. One can safelysay that the quote sounds like something the cold-hearted Kissinger & Company could have said or at least were thinking.)