A Positive PCR Nasal Swab Test is NOT the Same as a “Case” of Covid-19!!

Minnesota’s superintendents of public schools have been placed in a difficult position, one that the folks at the CDC and the Minnesota Department of Health (DOH) have put them in with their Distance Learning Plan 2.0.

 

I would like to point out some flaws in the DOH’s Distance Learning Plan 2.0, which I fear will be obediently and blindly followed by school districts across the state, without anyone in position of power and influence actually checking the DOH’s math.

 

The figures that were published in the August 5, 2020 Duluth News-Tribune presented the following information about the increasingly restrictive learning levels for schools according to the incidence of COVID-19 “cases” that have been reported to the DOH from the local communities.

 

What follows is the Distance Learning Plan 2.0 formula that totally ignores the reality that the RT-PCR nasal swab test, which is considered the “gold standard” for making the diagnosis of COVID-19, is fatally flawed, resulting in high percentages of false positive tests (see article below for more information) that make the test essentially worthless – and misleading.

 

The first of the serious problems dealt with in this article is the flawed DOH 5-part formula for how Minnesota’s children are to be educated this fall and into the future.

 

1] if the incidence of “cases” (actually positive tests, which are frequently false positives) is 0 – 9 per 10,000 in the community then all elementary and secondary schools can open for in-person learning. This tiny fraction (less than 10/10,000 means that there are essentially zero active “cases” (or at least what the Public Health bureaucracy considers “cases”) in the community;

 

2] if the community incidence was between 10 – 19 “cases” per 10,000 population,  in-person learning would be still be allowed for elementary students but “hybrid” learning would be offered for secondary students;

 

3] if there were 20 – 29 “cases“ per 10,000 population, then both elementary and secondary schools would have to be ”hybrid”;

 

4] if there were 30 – 49 “cases” per 10,000 population: elementary schools “could be hybrid” while secondary schools “would be hybrid”;

 

5) if there were 50 or more “cases” per 10,000 population, all students would be offered only distance learning, essentially meaning a return to essentially lock-down status for students – and parents.

 

However, each of those ranges of “cases” actually represents very small incremental fractions of the community that are erroneously assumed to be sick and contagious despite many of the cases being totally asymptomatic and essentially non-contagious.

 

A Positive PCR test IS NOT the Same as a “Case” of COVID-19!!

 

Moreover, these “assumptions” about how far to open our public schools are based on seriously flawed PCR tests – with the incidence of each of the five groups falling below the numbers of annual common cold coronavirus infections, annual influenza infection or the more common “influenza-like illnesses” (ILI) cases that are epidemic each flu season – none of which, it must be pointed out, have resulted in draconian lock-downs – or even mandatory mask-wearing.

 

What is being uncritically reported to the DOH includes totally asymptomatic “cases” of people that had false positive nasal swab tests but never were ill and never become ill after the false positive test results were revealed.

 

Unfortunately, these PCR tests have never been approved by the FDA for diagnostic testing, but that hasn’t stopped them from being very profitably marketed by a multitude of biomedical companies, including both major Big Pharma corporations and start-up outfits. Instead, they have been granted blanket Emergency Authorized Use by the FDA!

 

Every PCR test kit on the market – to my knowledge - has been found to have high percentages of false positive results, often in the 40% to 70% range. That makes them unreliable at best and worthless at worst, especially when the test results are used for propaganda purposes by greedy, vaccinology-illiterate billionaires like Bill Gates and his billionaire buddies at the World Economic Forum, co-opted academic epidemiologists/statisticians, CDC bureaucrats, WHO bureaucrats and greedy Big Pharma/Big Media/Big Medicine CEOs that have influenced governments all around the world.

 

Other innocent entities that are necessarily vaccinology-illiterate (because vaccinology and virology are such complex areas of study) and are therefore dependent on the advice of bought-and-paid for “scientists-for-profit”, include struggling small business owners, school superintendents, mayors, governors, presidents, politicians and even most physicians and nurses that are influencing serious decisions about the futures of our nation’s children, the economy and the planet.

 

The DOH’s statistical error that needs to be pointed out to all public school superintendents and school boards is this: the seemingly large “relative” differences between 10 or 20 or 30 of 50 “cases” per 10,000 only equates to 1 or 2 or 3 or 5 persons per 1,000 population, which is the same as the tiny numbers of 0.001, 0.002, 0.003 or 0.005 - in actual terms.

 

What should disturb everybody is the fact that the Minnesota Department of Health (probably at the behest of the CDC) has erroneously/deceptively (intentionally?) led us all to believe that a positive PCR test is the same as a “case” of COVID-19, whereas nothing could be further from the truth.

 

Please study the following article, which will document the above statements.

_________________________________________________________________________


A Critically Important Article That Casts Doubt on the Flawed COVID-19 “Statistics”

 

PCR Testing Can’t Tell the Difference Between Benign Common Cold Coronaviruses and the COVID-19 Coronavirus!!

 

By Julian Rose - Global Research - June 29, 2020 (1146 words)

 

https://www.globalresearch.ca/manufactured-pandemic-testing-people-any-strain-coronavirus-not-specifically-covid-19/5707781?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles

 

Theme: IntelligenceMedia DisinformationScience and Medicine

 

The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose

 

 

I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19.

 

There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus.

 

There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases.

 

This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply cannot make accurate assessments.

 

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms.

 

That’s because most Coronavirus strains are causing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms.

 

The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

 

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such).

 

PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

 

The problem is the test is known not to work.

 

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

 

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

 

The New Coronavirus Outbreak, COVID-19, Sounds Menacing and Is, BUT

 

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells.

 

Which most of us do, most of the time.

 

It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.

 

And that’s not even getting into the other issue – viral load.

 

If you remember the PCR works by amplifying minute amounts of DNA.

 

It therefore is useless at telling you how much virus you may have. And that’s the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness. Everyone will have a few viruses kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you, you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it.

 

But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

 

If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus DNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

 

And coronaviruses are incredibly common. A large percentage of the world’s human population will have coronavirus DNA in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.

 

Do you see where this is going yet? If you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus.

 

Coronaviruses are incredibly common and there’s many different strains. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for coronavirus even if the testing is being done properly - simply because such viruses are so common.

 

There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

 

All you need to do is select the sickest of these in a single location – say Wuhan, China – administer PCR tests to them and claim anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus (which will inevitably be quite a few) is suffering from a ‘new’ disease.

 

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases, a fairly high proportion of your sample will naturally go on to die.

 

You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

 

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist.

 

Now just run the same scam in other countries. Making sure to keep the fear message running high so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically.

 

Your only problem is going to be that – due to the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people - you are mislabeling your case numbers, and your deaths are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic.

 

But you can stop people pointing this out in several ways.

 

  1. You can claim this is just the beginning, more deaths are imminent and then use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone - claiming that the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

 

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

 

3. You can make up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

 

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus DNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

 

Take these 4 simple steps and you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks.

 

They cannot “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.