Quotes collated by Dr. Kohls


The named defendants are 1} Acting United States Secretary of Defense Chris Miller, in his official capacity; 2] Administrator of Federal Emergency Management Peter Gaynor, in his official capacity; and 3] Alex Azar, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity,


The Plaintiff lists eight reasons for her objections to mandated vaccinations with the dozens of totally experimental Covid vsccines that have not yet been thoroughly tested for long-term or even short-term safety or efficacy, but instead have been recklessly fast-tracked while not actually having formal FDA approval for use:

1. The testing for Covid is unreliable.

2. Covid cases aren’t being accurately reported.

 3. The purpose of the Lockdown is apparently not for health but to terminate national economies.

4. The vaccines have evaded standard safety testing.

5. Perfectly good cures for Covid, such as Ivermectin, are withheld; this casts doubt on the need for a vaccine.

6. There is a little-understood connection between Covid vaccine and DNA.

7. There is a possible use of a “vaccine tattoo” as a passport, implying surveillance, which would defeat plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment rights.

8. Scientific criticism is being censored.


Here are some of the quotes from the document:

“The Moderna vaccine skipped the animal testing altogether....  And it was tested on only 45 people – three people got so sick they had to be hospitalized... They are only giving these vaccines [tests]  ... to the healthiest people.... You cannot be pregnant, you cannot be overweight, you must have never smoked a cigarette, you must have no respiratory problems in your family...  you can’t have rheumatoid arthritis or any autoimmune disease. There has to be no history of seizure in the family. These are the people they’re testing the vaccine on.” Referring to four pharma giants, including Pfizer, RFK pointed out that “just in the last decade, those companies have paid 35 billion dollars in criminal penalties, damages, fines, for lying to doctors, for defrauding science, for falsifying science, for killing hundreds of thousands of Americans knowingly.” -- Attorney Robert F Kennedy, Children’s Health Defense

As I understand it, Mrs. Merkel (German Prime Minister)has reserved 54 million doses of this gene-based vaccine from the British company [Astra Zeneca, connected with Oxford]....  This study [is] published in Lancet. What the English did, in Oxford, because the side effects were so severe, from that point on, all ... were given a high dose of paracetamol. That’s a fever-reducing painkiller. In response to the vaccination?  No. To prevent the reaction. That means they received the painkiller first and then the vaccination afterwards. Unbelievable.” -- Dr Suchari Bhakdi,retired Chair of Medical Microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany and author of the runaway international bestseller, “Corona, False Alarm?”

“… in the last six months…the FDA, in concert with Dr. Fauci and the NIH panels that he's arranged to discuss his various drugs, remdesivir and hydroxychloroquine… have had major conflicts of interest; a panel with 54 scientists on it…had 18 with financial ties to pharma manufacturers. They went and approved the patent medication (Remdesivir) and they disapproved the generic medication hydroxychloroquine.”-- Harvey Risch, Professor of Epidemiology at Yale

"All I ask is for the NIH to review our data that we've compiled of all of the emerging data (on the highly effective drug Ivermectin)-- we have almost 30 studies. Everyone is reliably and reproducibly positive showing the dramatic impacts of Ivermectin. Please, I'm just asking that they review our manuscript. Mountains of data have emerged from many centers and countries around the world, showing the miraculous effectiveness of Ivermectin. It basically obliterates transmission of this virus. If you take it, you will not get sick.”-- Dr Pierre Kory, a pulmonologist, speaking at a December 8, 202 0hearing of the US Senate Homeland Security Committee, requesting clearance for the drug Ivermectin

:…as I understand it, one of vaccines is a packaged fragment of viral mRNA. This is injected into the muscle where that fragment is translated into a viral protein fragment that stimulates an antibody response and should attack the virus. Does anybody, I mean anybody, realize how many things can go wrong with this? Certainly, one possibility is a massive NONSPECIFIC autoimmune response.

“The Moderna ‘vaccine’ is designed to be a transfection vaccine, meaning it literally is meant to genetically modify your cells.... Genetic material codes for proteins in your body. That's what DNA and rNA do. Your body creates the proteins that build your body. Proteins are unique to the organism. They are also the basis for recognizing self from not self..... So when your body has foreign DNA injected into it, or when foreign particles like nano-particles (Pfizer vaccine) are introduced, there is a risk that your body will literally start to attack itself. ... Catastrophe awaits.” -- Dr Suchari Bhakdiretired Chair of Medical Microbiology at University of Mainz, Germany and author of “Corona, False Alarm?” Runaway International Bestseller


Kary Mullis received the Nobel Prize in 1993 for his “polymerase chain reaction” (PCR) method of amplifying a stretch of DNA. He advised against using it for diagnosis. But that is what hospitals are doing, with results that must be considered guesswork.

Pascal Sacre, an emergency room doctor in Belgium, is an expert on RT-PCR (real time polymerase chain reaction). He says that the number of cases reported by government is the number of persons who “test positive,” but that no clinician ever decides on the basis of a test exclusively – one must look at the patent and know his symptoms. 

Tanzania’s president John Magufuli said the imported Covid test kits were faulty as they had returned positive results on a goat and a pawpaw fruit.

 “you can see how worthless and misguided these mass tests are.” -- Michael Schnedlitz, Austrian MP performing the Covid test live in Parliament, showing that a sample of Coca-Cola tested positive for Covid. 

 “There is utterly unfounded public hysteria driven by the media and politicians. It’s outrageous. [Covid] should be thought of as nothing more than a bad flu season. Masks are utterly useless. There is no evidence base for their effectiveness whatsoever.” -- Dr Rod Hodkinson, FRCPC, Alberta, Canada - November 13, 2020

Politicians and governments are suppressing science. They do so in the public interest, they say, to accelerate availability of diagnostics and treatments [and] to bring products to market at unprecedented speed. Both of these reasons are partly plausible...  But ... the pandemic has revealed how the medical-political complex can be manipulated in an emergency....Researchers from Public Health England and collaborating institutions sensibly pushed to publish their study findings before the government committed to buying a million of these tests but were blocked by the health department and the prime minister’s office.”  -- An editorial in the British Medical Journal, of November 13, 2020


The “Event 201” meeting discussed “controlling the narrative.” The participants, many of them scientists, stressed the importance of censoring “conspiracy theories” and even preventing debate with doctors who disagreed about Covid. Typically, scientists have published even radical ideas in journals and waited for response from peers. This new turnaround is very telling. The owners of social media further confuse the public by deleting, from Facebook and YouTube, any criticism of, or skepticism about, the pandemic – saying that it “violates community standards.”