Departments
New court filing reveals how the 2004 Ohio presidential election was hacked
by Bob Fitrakis
July 20, 2011
A new filing in the King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell case includes a copy of the Ohio Secretary of State election production system configuration that was in use in Ohio's 2004 presidential election when there was a sudden and unexpected shift in votes for George W. Bush.
The filing also includes the revealing deposition of the late Michael Connell. Connell served as the IT guru for the Bush family and Karl Rove. Connell ran the private IT firm GovTech that created the controversial system that transferred Ohio's vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech. That is when the vote shift happened, not predicted by the exit polls, that led to Bush's unexpected victory. Connell died a month and a half after giving this deposition in a suspicious small plane crash.
Additionally, the filing contains the contract signed between then-Ohio Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell and Connell's company, GovTech Solutions. Also included that contract a graphic architectural map of the Secretary of State's election night server layout system.
Cliff Arnebeck, lead attorney in the King Lincoln case, exchanged emails with IT security expert Stephen Spoonamore. Arnebeck asked Spoonamore whether or not SmarTech had the capability to "input data" and thus alter the results of Ohio's 2004 election. Spoonamore responded: "Yes. They would have had data input capacities. The system might have been set up to log which source generated the data but probably did not."
Spoonamore explained that "they [SmarTech] have full access and could change things when and if they want."
Arnebeck specifically asked "Could this be done using whatever bypass techniques Connell developed for the web hosting function." Spoonamore replied "Yes."
Spoonamore concluded from the architectural maps of the Ohio 2004 election reporting system that, "SmarTech was a man in the middle. In my opinion they were not designed as a mirror, they were designed specifically to be a man in the middle."
A "man in the middle" is a deliberate computer hacking setup, which allows a third party to sit in between computer transmissions and illegally alter the data. A mirror site, by contrast, is designed as a backup site in case the main computer configuration fails.
Spoonamore claims that he confronted then-Secretary of State Blackwell at a secretary of state IT conference in Boston where he was giving a seminar in data security. "Blackwell freaked and refused to speak to me when I confronted him about it long before I met you," he wrote to Arnebeck.
Read the email correspondence here [pdf]
On December 14, 2007, then-Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, who replaced Blackwell, released her evaluation and validation of election-related equipment, standards and testing (Everest study) which found that touchscreen voting machines were vulnerable to hacking with relative ease.
Until now, the architectural maps and contracts from the Ohio 2004 election were never made public, which may indicate that the entire system was designed for fraud. In a previous sworn affidavit to the court, Spoonamore declared: "The SmarTech system was set up precisely as a King Pin computer used in criminal acts against banking or credit card processes and had the needed level of access to both county tabulators and Secretary of State computers to allow whoever was running SmarTech computers to decide the output of the county tabulators under its control."
Spoonamore also swore that "...the architecture further confirms how this election was stolen. The computer system and SmarTech had the correct placement, connectivity, and computer experts necessary to change the election in any manner desired by the controllers of the SmarTech computers."
Project Censored named the outsourcing of Ohio's 2004 election votes to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee to a company owned by Republican partisans as one of the most censored stories in the world.
In the Connell deposition, plaintiffs' attorneys questioned Connell regarding gwb43, a website that was live on election night operating out of the White House and tied directly into SmarTech's server stacks in Chattanooga, Tennessee which contained Ohio's 2004 presidential election results.
The transfer of the vote count to SmarTech in Chattanooga, Tennessee remains a mystery. This would have only happened if there was a complete failure of the Ohio computer election system. Connell swore under oath that, "To the best of my knowledge, it was not a fail-over case scenario – or it was not a failover situation."
Bob Magnan, a state IT specialist for the secretary of state during the 2004 election, agreed that there was no failover scenario. Magnan said he was unexpectedly sent home at 9 p.m. on election night and private contractors ran the system for Blackwell.
The architectural maps, contracts, and Spoonamore emails, along with the history of Connell's partisan activities, shed new light on how easy it was to hack the 2004 Ohio presidential election.
Download the Plaintiffs' Brief here [zip]
--
Bob Fitrakis is co-counsel in the King Lincoln case.
|
 |
Recent Election Issues Articles
Has America's stolen election process finally hit prime time? December 29, 2011 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Can we transform labor's Buckeye victory into a new era of election protection? November 12, 2011 Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
Ohio Election issues November 5, 2011 Albert A. Gabel
Ohio ramps up fight for Election Day October 29, 2011 Bruce Bostick
Straw poll results at Ohio Union from Franklin County Republican Party October 23, 2011 Juliana Schultz
Rios race pushes Green Party politics October 16, 2011 Bob Fitrakis
Über-Vultures: The Billionaires Who Would Pick Our President October 7, 2011 Greg Palast
BLACKBOXVOTING: RACIAL DILUTION OF VOTING RECORDS September 30, 2011 Bev Harris
The theft of 2012 September 21, 2011 Greg Palast
Pentagon Papers whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg endorses Norman Solomon for Congress: Will join the candidate on campaign trail September 21, 2011 Solomon for Congress
Ten years after and still no third major party September 12, 2011 Christopher Bifani
Voterism: A government for The New Millennium September 2, 2011 William John Cox
Center for Hand-Counted Paper Ballots sends letter to all recall candidates regarding election protection August 12, 2011 Sheila Parks, Ed.D.
Radio Interview with Dr. Sheila Parks August 7, 2011 Pete Johnson
New court filing reveals how the 2004 Ohio presidential election was hacked July 20, 2011 Bob Fitrakis
Hacking the recalls: Why we must have hand-counted paper ballots and citizen exit polls July 10, 2011 Grant Petty Ph.d and Sheila Parks, Ed.D.
The Ohio Republican Party is poised to steal the 2012 vote in Ohio July 4, 2011 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Wisconsin: Democracy in our hands June 25, 2011 Sheila Parks, Ed.D.
Waukesha fraud – Deep throat speaks: A slip of paper is the “deep throat” of the Supreme Court Election Fraud June 17, 2011 Dennis Kern
Ostroy Report: When Did the Truth Become "Gotcha" Journalism? May 20, 2011 Andy Ostroy
New Hampshire is going against the grain May 1, 2011 Black Box Voting
To The American Media: Time To Face The Reality Of Election Rigging April 11, 2011 Jonathan Simon
Strange Twist in Wisconsin Battle April 10, 2011 Lisa Pease
Bob Fitrakis, Mark Crispin Miller & Jonathan Simon to speak at NYC's Left Forum on electronic voting issues March 12, 2011 Staff
Where there's a Will there’s a way to invalidly defend Bush v. Gore February 6, 2011 Joseph C. Sommer
Will Karl Rove bury the record of his 2004 election theft? January 10, 2011 Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman
Read Election Issues Articles by Year: 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 |