Letters to the Editor/<br>  Free Press Forum

QUOTE: "If Kerry hadn't conceded, the right wingers would have screamed bloody murder. But what else is new?"

Well, and while "playing" "conspiracy theorist", I'd say that the answer to that rhetorically indented question of Mr. Wasserman's is or at least may possibly be that the two most likely candidates to win the 2004 US presidential election - Bush and Kerry - were two Bonesmen - "Order of Skull & Bones" - facing or - pretending, anyway - confronting each other. And the allegiance the members of S&B members have amongst each other is stronger, given a considerably higher priority than duty to nation, honesty, fairness, etc.

As you have already guessed, I certainly don't know the above fact(s) actually had anything to do with the 2004 election; however, there's certainly at least reason to carefully consider the possibility that this indeed was a present element.

We can't change what happened, we can't change what Kerry did. That was yesterday. Today we must continue the fight. We must do what Kucinich has taught us. We stay in the battle to the very end. The end doesn't happen until the electoral college votes.

We the People are the ones in charge, not the DNC, not John Kerry. I say we follow Kucinich's example and STAY. I know in my heart we can overturn the election results. We in Boone NC are gathering, we are going to pressure the media to cover this.

Thank you sir, Mr. Wasserman,

Thank you so much for not backing down on your news.  The major T.V. news is not quite reporting it the way it is or not reporting it at all. Know one knows why?  

There was wide fraud and discrepencies in numbers all over the United States, but especially Ohio and Florida. I beleive John Kerry is the true President-Elect. I hope our country proves this election was a fraud. More people were purposely stopped or misguided to vote for John Kerry.  The internet site Commongroundcommonsense.com/civil rights/fair election practices  has had more information and started to really fight this by getting out true facts about this election. Log on as invaluable information is there.

By- the-way, where there was paper-votes the vote was always John Kerry ahead! Machines (Diebold) showed more for Bush with outlandish numbers for Bush!

We cannot let this happen to our country. Even foreign news is doing a better job of reporting this than the USA. NOT ANOTHER 2000!

"FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU. FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME."
       OUST BUSH!

WE, AS DEMOCRATS, NEED TO BE ANGRY AND STAY ANGRY UNTIL SOMEONE IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE FRAUD ON NOV. 2, 2004.

I DONT WANT 4 MORE WARS UNDER THIS PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A PRESIDENT. HES NOT MY PRESIDENT, NEVER WILL BE.

Thank you for your article on the paperless machines. Here is how I think they got us all to use them.

I would like to respond to all those who have suggested both in the print media and on the airwaves that those of us who voted for John Kerry should “get over it”, and prepare ourselves for another four years of “Bush Family Values”.

Murdering 100,000 innocent people in Iraq is not a value. It is a crime against all the laws of man and God. The latter does not, contrary to the opinion of millions of Bush voters, live in the White House, but only a very flawed excuse for the former.

The God I do worship enjoins me always to stand up to evil, to speak truth to power and corruption in high places. Call us Legion, for there are many who believe as I do, and who have no intention of giving up the chief value necessary to combat the abuses of the Bush Administration, namely courage.

Hi and thanks for all your work.  I noticed one of the 12 ways Bush stole the election was Diebold.  I just want to put my two cents in that this is the number one issue for progressives until we get it fixed.  We simply must, must get the vote back out from corporate hands.  It must be a transparent process.   Call me a whiney liberal, but I cannot believe this is happening.  If Democratic leaning corporations had control of the voting machines, the whole media would be up in arms, and everyone would be saying Kerry is an illegitimate president.

Thanks for listening to me rant.  We absolutely must make this priority #1.  The exit polls were right.

Tom:   I understand your anger, but MAYBE just MAYBE,  

170,000 democrats did not vote for Bush;  

maybe all the new voters you turned out did vote for Kerry.  

The exit polls agreed with what you said, the majority were voting for Kerry!  

And a lot of analysis has been done on the exit polls which shows somthing is rotten and stinks big time.  

See [attachment] and  ustogether.org/Florida_Election.htm

In the Democratic controlled swing states the actual voting data match the exit polls within one half of one percent.  

In the Republican controlled (read election supervised) states there was often a 5-7 percentage vote swing from the exit polls and ALWAYS in George Bush's favour.  

There are news reports that Bush's team sat him down after the exit polls showed Kerry leading  by 1 to 3 points in all the swing states and told him he would probably lose. Then they began the SPIN:  

I just want to pledge a thanks to you for covering the miscount incident here in Gahanna, Ohio on your freepress site. You mentioned on the press that there was a miscount at the New Life Church at the Gahanna, Ohio polling site...well...that's just about a mile down the road from where I live and it doesn't suprise me. This is the same place that displayed bulletins confirming "30 more days of prayer" prior to election. Could this prayer be aimed towards John Kerry or President George W. Bush? I don't know what that mysterious bulletin meant, other than the fact that this is a church that likes to preach to the bypassers about how high of a brand of faith content they carry with their to-close-to-the-road messages. BUT, I'd say that they probably lean towards the right for the simple reason that this is the party that pledges that it is all about faith and values to cover-up their lies and propaganda.

The greatest of all falsehoods visited upon the American people by the Bush Administration is that the President’s policies, both foreign and domestic, spring from the combination of a muscular Christianity and direct revelations from Almighty God to George W. Bush.

It is not Christian to invade a country which had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11, killing 100,000 innocent citizens of Iraq and causing the deaths of over a thousand Americans to achieve this horrible injustice. Jesus never committed nor advocated such a crime, nor, I assure you, did He ever tell George Bush to go forth and do so in His Name.

Jesus said, "I was born into the world to tell the truth”. Can the same be said of President Bush?

The Son of God never justified the use of torture against those imprisoned, whether in war or peacetime, neither did He believe in false imprisonment by the denial of fundamental legal and human rights.

Nowhere in the Bible do I read of Jesus Christ taking money from the poor and middle classes for the further enrichment of those whose assets already number in the billions of dollars.