Global
‘Asaf told B’Tselem: “He [a soldier] told me that I had to go inside houses that he would identify and open the door and windows and turn on the lights. He told me to tell anyone who was in the houses to go outside with their hands raised over their heads. He told me that if someone refused, I had to come outside and tell him and that if I didn’t tell him the truth, he would kill me or put me in jail."
Condoleezza Rice protests vigorously that the Bush team was doing everything it could to attack Al Qaeda, and it is within this arena that Clarke's criticism is contained. This is a debate about covering the dump to halt a plague of rats. The homeowner 9/11 survivors are all for that, but they want to know how the rats got into their house to kill the baby, and no one wants to talk about that. They put up a clamor and a study commission is created to find out. The question still hangs: How did the rats get in?
There are all the usual reasons for rejecting a Bush judicial nominee -- he's only tried one case; no understanding of the Constitution; author of the "enemy combatant doctrine" that allows American citizens to be held in prison without trial, without counsel and without knowing the charges against them. But the fatal faux pas is the feather-blowing tale of Haynes' role as the top Defense Department lawyer in the case of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
Bryan Thompson
Joyce Chumbley
Editor's note: To read more about Athan Gibbs and electronic voting, visit www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2004/853 or www.freepress.org/columns/display/3/2004/834.
I have just run across your article entitled "Death of a patriot: No more" from March 17, 2004. As a professional in the computer industry for twenty years, I must take exception to some of the claims made by ignorant people in the Democratic and Republican camps who know little, if anything, about computers.
You quote Gibbs as saying "Inevitably, computers mess up". That is an interesting statement and is clearly used to stir up sentiment without offering any context for the statement whatsoever.
Let's look at that a moment. If computers "mess up", then it is safe to say that, as one can simply observe from life around them in general, people mess up more than computers. The facts show that computers only do what people tell them to do, and they do it exactly many millions of times per second. Computers simply are not known to make any mistakes, while people do all the time.