Global
It should also be IMPEACHABLE for Bush to have buddies: Sequoia, Diabold, ES&S plus another can't remember to be having
them manufacturing voting machines--
No Paper Trail (no printout)--We have to more fast to at least get Rep. Rush Holt's bill "Voter Confidence Act" (requiring every voting machine have paper printout trail) pass in time.
Patricia D. Hilton, "The American Homemaker"
P.S. I WROTE TO REPS & SENS AND U.S. SUPREME COURT TO BEGIN IMPREACHMENT PROCEEDINGS.
No Paper Trail (no printout)--We have to more fast to at least get Rep. Rush Holt's bill "Voter Confidence Act" (requiring every voting machine have paper printout trail) pass in time.
Patricia D. Hilton, "The American Homemaker"
P.S. I WROTE TO REPS & SENS AND U.S. SUPREME COURT TO BEGIN IMPREACHMENT PROCEEDINGS.
Dear Free Press,
I've been traveling a lot lately and everywhere I go I've talked to people about our current administration. I've
distilled my findings into the following verse:
Here is what I've learned in my travels round about:
That George Bush is a moron and Cheney is a lout,
And Rumsfeld hides his emptiness behind a knowing frown
When word comes from Iraq that another chopper's down.
Greg Farnum
Auburn Hills
When trade ministers from the Americas gather for the Free Trade Area of
the Americas (FTAA) Ministerial in Miami November 20-21, U.S. Trade
Representative Robert Zoellick and his team of advisors are unlikely to
walk away with the agreements they seek. The FTAA is an ambitious
undertaking intended to link every country in the Western Hemisphere
(except Cuba) through a free-trade agreement covering a broad array of
issues.
Proponents argue that the accord would increase trade and economic growth among the participating countries, leading to increased prosperity and strengthened democracy throughout the region. But a large and growing number of citizens organizations and some of the region's governments, particularly Brazil, argue that such an agreement would devastate farmers, working people and the environment, and consolidate the power of transnational corporations.
Proponents argue that the accord would increase trade and economic growth among the participating countries, leading to increased prosperity and strengthened democracy throughout the region. But a large and growing number of citizens organizations and some of the region's governments, particularly Brazil, argue that such an agreement would devastate farmers, working people and the environment, and consolidate the power of transnational corporations.
In a March 7th Bush Commentary, you note:
"Jack Beatty in the Atlantic Monthly: Beatty suggests ... Bush's apparent belief that God has appointed him to lead a global crusade against evil.
"He writes, 'If this is what Bush believes, if his talk of Armageddon is not just catnip for the religious right, then he is in a fair way to becoming the American Ayatollah.
"'Bush's belief in God is based on his personal narrative of divine salvation as a recovering alcoholic. He once told members of the clergy, 'There is only one reason that I am in the Oval Office and not in a bar. I found faith. I found God.'"
First, I highly suggest that the two previous articles noted in my piece GEORGE W. and ALCOHOLISM as published In Counterpunch be read. Michael O'McCarthy: Bush and Alcoholism (Counterpunch - October 19, 2002)
There is nothing, absolutely nothing to indicate in the lifestyle of George Bush that he is a "recovered" alcoholic. (As indicated above, Bush explicitly implies that he is alcoholic.)
"Jack Beatty in the Atlantic Monthly: Beatty suggests ... Bush's apparent belief that God has appointed him to lead a global crusade against evil.
"He writes, 'If this is what Bush believes, if his talk of Armageddon is not just catnip for the religious right, then he is in a fair way to becoming the American Ayatollah.
"'Bush's belief in God is based on his personal narrative of divine salvation as a recovering alcoholic. He once told members of the clergy, 'There is only one reason that I am in the Oval Office and not in a bar. I found faith. I found God.'"
First, I highly suggest that the two previous articles noted in my piece GEORGE W. and ALCOHOLISM as published In Counterpunch be read. Michael O'McCarthy: Bush and Alcoholism (Counterpunch - October 19, 2002)
There is nothing, absolutely nothing to indicate in the lifestyle of George Bush that he is a "recovered" alcoholic. (As indicated above, Bush explicitly implies that he is alcoholic.)
This was an outstanding article:
Harvey Wasserman
Bush to veterans: Drop Dead
November 12, 2003
I wished more journalists were just as brave, take their collective heads out of the sand, and tell it like it is as Mr. Wasserman did in this article. I am proud of him and journalists like him. He has my heartfelt support to continue to do HIS JOB unlike others who have abdicated theirs!!!
Bush to veterans: Drop Dead
November 12, 2003
I wished more journalists were just as brave, take their collective heads out of the sand, and tell it like it is as Mr. Wasserman did in this article. I am proud of him and journalists like him. He has my heartfelt support to continue to do HIS JOB unlike others who have abdicated theirs!!!
George Soros is dedicating his life to defeating
George Bush. He feels that Bush has the same dangerous
tendencies that Soros suffered, first under Hitler and
then under the Soviets.
A belief that God is on your side, that contrary evidence is mere bias and that those who oppose you are non-patriots marks the extremist, even if their God is ideology.
Unfortunately Soros, by focusing on the extremism of Bush and the Righteous Right, misses the larger picture of our problems with democracy. If an enemy attacks you, most agree that you must take up arms and defeat him. But that doesn't mean you believe in war. In similar fashion, Soros needs to focus his war against Bush beyond this inferior presidency. Defeating Bush by outspending him is a bit like defeating Osama bin Laden by restricting freedoms and wounding innocents.
A belief that God is on your side, that contrary evidence is mere bias and that those who oppose you are non-patriots marks the extremist, even if their God is ideology.
Unfortunately Soros, by focusing on the extremism of Bush and the Righteous Right, misses the larger picture of our problems with democracy. If an enemy attacks you, most agree that you must take up arms and defeat him. But that doesn't mean you believe in war. In similar fashion, Soros needs to focus his war against Bush beyond this inferior presidency. Defeating Bush by outspending him is a bit like defeating Osama bin Laden by restricting freedoms and wounding innocents.
Thank you for this article. I agree with the sentiments expressed and you brought to my attention additonal facts that I
was unaware of. Regarding the issue of Bush donning a military uniform as a civilian, you omitted a comparison to another
national leader who enjoyed parading around in a uniform, while never serving in his country's military: Saddam Hussein.
Keep up the good work! We all must do whatever we can to expose this sham of an administration before it's too late.
LONDON -- This city has been the November host of a global tyrant, on whose rampages the sun never sets. His
name is not George Bush but Rupert Murdoch.
Bush, acknowledged as their legitimately elected leader by at least some of his fellow citizens, presents so frail a political physique that it seems faintly ludicrous to impose on him even the conventional honorific, "leader of the free world," let alone the robust dignity of "tyrant."
The president's arrival in the United Kingdom was preceded by interviews with British newspapers in which he paid humble respect to those democratic traditions permitting Britons to assemble in vast numbers and to cover him with ridicule and abuse. He allowed himself to be scheduled for a possibly humiliating session with relatives of British soldiers killed in Iraq.
Bush, acknowledged as their legitimately elected leader by at least some of his fellow citizens, presents so frail a political physique that it seems faintly ludicrous to impose on him even the conventional honorific, "leader of the free world," let alone the robust dignity of "tyrant."
The president's arrival in the United Kingdom was preceded by interviews with British newspapers in which he paid humble respect to those democratic traditions permitting Britons to assemble in vast numbers and to cover him with ridicule and abuse. He allowed himself to be scheduled for a possibly humiliating session with relatives of British soldiers killed in Iraq.
RIO DE JANEIRO -- After a quarter-century of intensive grassroots
organizing and a victorious presidential campaign a year ago, Brazilian
social movements are in a strong position as they push the left-wing
Workers Party government to fulfill its promises. The contrast to
Washington’s current political climate is as diametrical as the
opposite seasons of the two countries. Yet Brazilian activists are now
giving heightened priority to the same concern that preoccupies an
increasing number of people in the United States -- the imperative of
challenging the corporate media.
On the night of Nov. 10, at the headquarters of the Brazilian Press Association here in Rio, more than 100 activists gathered to help kick off the nationwide Campaign for Media Democratization. In spite of progress for social justice, Brazil’s mass media remain firmly in the hands of nine wealthy families intent on serving the interests of conservative economic elites. The contradictions between an ascendant democratic movement and a timeworn media oligarchy are extreme.
On the night of Nov. 10, at the headquarters of the Brazilian Press Association here in Rio, more than 100 activists gathered to help kick off the nationwide Campaign for Media Democratization. In spite of progress for social justice, Brazil’s mass media remain firmly in the hands of nine wealthy families intent on serving the interests of conservative economic elites. The contradictions between an ascendant democratic movement and a timeworn media oligarchy are extreme.
The Police Officers for Equal Rights have given City Council our plans for a Citizen Review Board over seven years ago. We reinstated our position about the citizen review board during the U. S. Department of Justice Investigation. Our view points have not changed. The problem of racial profiling in our community has reinforced our position.
It appears that certain organizations and so called leaders what to “reinvent our citizen review board” and take credit for all the hard work our organization has done on the issue of racial profiling. The P.O.E.R. is committed to increase the awareness and education our Black Community. We will not engage in political games or give into any city leader selfish motivation.
The P.O.E.R. has given the city government enough time to do the right thing regarding these issues. Mayor Coleman was a city councilman and now he is mayor of Columbus. The leadership of this city has not changed to protect the rights of Black citizens. It is time for action – it is not the time for more panel discussions and committees.
It appears that certain organizations and so called leaders what to “reinvent our citizen review board” and take credit for all the hard work our organization has done on the issue of racial profiling. The P.O.E.R. is committed to increase the awareness and education our Black Community. We will not engage in political games or give into any city leader selfish motivation.
The P.O.E.R. has given the city government enough time to do the right thing regarding these issues. Mayor Coleman was a city councilman and now he is mayor of Columbus. The leadership of this city has not changed to protect the rights of Black citizens. It is time for action – it is not the time for more panel discussions and committees.