Gentlemen,

Why do you believe that whistleblowers were so anxious to speak to the NYT regarding executive branch eavesdropping only weeks before the elections?

Why that particular timing on THEIR part?

All voting machine and central tabulator communications over public networks would have been easily tapped. Given the extraordinary leeway given to interagency communications concerning such 'take,' there is simply no guarantee that it did not end up in the wrong hands.

The VP and his cabal are notorious for using raw intelligence data straight out of collections programs. That would have been raw intelligence straight out of a collection program. We already know by now that they have been breaking the law regulating such programs in the US.

Draw your own conclusions as to a brand new legal angle...

Regards,
PS