Advertisement

28 February 2004
The Diebold-type Computerized voting machine can NOT give an OFFICIAL count,...a Paper-Ballot ONLY can be OFFICIAL
Read more
Phillip Dragonetti
The electronic result inside the  Diebold voting machine is not sufficiently trust-worthty to be an official result.

We do NOT want a paper-"TRAIL", ...We want  Paper to be the PRIMARY document that becomes the Official...
28 February 2004
Paper-Trail is not enough
Read more
Bob Donatelle
Regarding Bob Fitrakis's article on the Diebold (and other) Direct Recording Electronic (DRE) voting machines that the US Government is trying to foist on the American public.

It is very important to not get the wool...
26 February 2004
Change best achieved from ground-up, not top-down'
Read more
John Janney
A vote for Ralph Nader is a vote for a message, not the presidency.

The Nader campaign platform contains many good and attractive points. His focus on improving the conditions of Americans by way of better access to health...
25 February 2004
Diebold and the Right Wing
Read more
Ben Haddad
Dr. Fitrakis,

I'm not sure this is your correct e-mail address, but in case it is, I wanted to briefly give you a few facts related to your portrayal of my company's role with the State of Maryland's voting system.

First...

25 February 2004
Diebold and Fitrakis column
Read more
Brian Hanley
Hi,

Just thought I'd say that I worked on ATM systems at a major bank when I was younger. I was there until they changed out the old 910 models for the 911 ATMs. ATMs haven't changed much in the last 15 - 20 years. Remarkably little...

25 February 2004
Slamming Entitlement
Read more
Norma Sherry
Franklin Delano Roosevelt must be turning in his grave. Entitlement programs, hogwash. Medicare, phooey. Medicaid, who the hell cares? After-school programs, let them take care of themselves. Social Security, let 'em cake. The New Deal is...

Pages

Subscribe to Letters to the Editor/<br>  Free Press Forum