Advertisement
BANGKOK, Thailand -- The U.S. government's National Human Genome
	Research Institute (NHGRI) is studying if every American baby should
	undergo extensive DNA sequencing and analysis at birth, while China
	and other countries are more advanced toward that goal despite reports
	of human rights violations.
	   DNA, the double helix of deoxyribonucleic acid, can reveal a
	person's physical and psychiatric health, identity, relatives and
	other details.
	   But databases of people's DNA could enable governments, police,
	hackers, corporations, forgers and others to abuse the information.
	   Sequencing or identifying details of DNA could also be used to
	create bioweapons to kill ethnic groups or individuals.
	   "I do know that if you look in the last 15 years, the investment in
	genomics in particular have been more substantial in countries like
	China, South Korea, Singapore, and even places like Brazil," NHGRI
	Director Eric D. Green said in an interview.
	   "Support for biomedical research in the United States has not
	really kept up with inflation, and other countries have taken our
	playbook and run with it more aggressively -- by 'playbook' I mean
	genomic tools and technologies.
	   "We're hoping to see similar increases in the future."
	   The world's largest genetic research center is in Shenzhen city,
	about 20 miles from Hong Kong.
	   China's databases hold an estimated 40 million people's DNA samples.
	   They include DNA from ethnic Uighurs in rebellious Xinjiang
	province where 10 million Uighurs and other predominantly Muslim
	minorities live.
	   "The Chinese government's mandatory data-banking of the entire
	[Xinjiang] population's biodata, including DNA, has understandably
	raised alarm bells among rights advocates, given that China lacks the
	kinds of legal safeguards that other countries implement to manage
	their DNA databases," said Florida state Republican party Senator
	Marco Rubio, Chairman of the Congressional-Executive Commission on
	China.
	   Mr. Rubio's February 8 statement was in his letter to Waltham,
	Massachusetts-based Thermo Fisher Scientific's CEO Marc N. Casper who
	is vice chair of the U.S.-China Business Council.
	   Mr. Casper's DNA sequencers are reportedly operating in Xinjiang
	"where grave human rights violations are being perpetrated by the
	Chinese government" in its DNA collection, Mr. Rubio wrote.
	   "Can you provide details of your relationship with the Xinjiang
	Public Security Bureau and the Chinese Ministry of Public Security,
	and relevant discussions you may have had regarding the intended use
	of Thermo Fisher Scientific's equipment?" Mr. Rubio asked.
	   "Chinese authorities in Xinjiang are collecting DNA samples,
	fingerprints, iris scans, and blood types of all residents in the
	region between the age of 12 and 65," New York-based Human Rights
	Watch (HRW) said in a 3,500-word report in December.
	   "Thermo Fisher Scientific has supplied the Xinjiang police with
	some of these DNA sequencers," HRW said.
	   HRW asked Thermo Fisher Scientific for an explanation in 2017 and
	received a reply which stated: "Given the global nature of our
	operations, it is not possible for us to monitor the use or
	application of all products we manufactured."
	   Beijing says DNA data improves health services and saves lives from
	undiagnosed diseases.
	   The "blood cards for DNA collection" are linked to each
	individual's identity number, according to the Chinese government's
	Office of Population Service and Management and Real Name Registration
	Work Leadership Committee.
	   One unconfirmed report said China's commercial DNA sequencing
	market was $1 billion in 2016, but it was unclear the total amount of
	private and government spending.
	   China finalized plans for a "multi-billion dollar project" which,
	during the next 15 years, will "sequence the genomes of many millions
	of citizens," Wired magazine reported.
	   China's DNA projects dwarf the Bethesda, Maryland-based NHGRI,
	which is under the National Institutes of Health and headed by the
	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
	   The NHGRI's 2018 budget request is about $400 million, a decrease
	of $118 from 2017, the institute said.
	   It invested more than $155 million for DNA sequencing technology
	during the past 12 years.
	   Separately, corporations involved in DNA collection, analysis or
	other services include Illumina, Roche, GSK, AstraZeneca, Veritas
	Genetics, 23andMe, Seven Bridges and others.
	   NHGRI Director Green's institute is famous for its Human Genome
	Project which, for the first time, "read out all of human DNA's
	letters and determined their precise order," he said.
	   That project successfully ended 15 years ago. Now the institute
	uses individual patients' genomic information for medical diagnoses
	and treatment.
	   "We're seeing exciting developments on how to actually take
	patients with rare diseases -- that you have no idea what is wrong
	with them -- and be able to, for something like $1,000, be able to
	read out all their DNA and be able to figure out what is wrong with
	that patient and in some cases identifying ways to treat them."
	   Mr. Green was in Bangkok to receive Thailand's international Prince
	Mahidol Award on January 31 for his expertise on human genomics.
	   Asked what China was doing in genomics that the U.S. is not, Mr.
	Green replied:
	   "They have built some very large programs in genome sequencing. We
	have genome sequencing abilities. They have simply scaled more
	aggressively than we have."
	   Sequencing reveals the order of the four chemical "bases" which
	create a DNA molecule.
	   That information can display what lines of DNA turn genes on or
	off, and show mutations which may result in disease -- plus other
	information.
	   "I do know that they [China] are talking more about the notion of
	sequencing every child at birth. I don't know if they are doing that
	yet.
	   "My institute actually has a series of grants to try to study that,
	you know, whether that is a desirable thing or not.
	   "I think it's still a little too early," he said.
	   "I'm not afraid of it by any means. There are some who perhaps are.
	I absolutely believe people should have a choice.
	   "Eventually we will get to a point where we will want to -- if it
	is not complete genome sequencing, we will want to get a lot more
	genomic information than we currently get from our small screening
	efforts.
	   "There's a newborn screening program in the United States and most
	developed countries in the world for a handful of genetic diseases,"
	he said.
	   Mr. Green has not had his own DNA sequenced.
	   "No, not yet.  But fortunately I'm very healthy. I would tell you
	that if I or a member of my family would get cancer tomorrow, I would
	use the tools of genomics immediately to try and read out the DNA of
	the tumor."