The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
Soon after the American death toll in Iraq passed the 1,000
mark, I thought of Saadoun Hammadi and some oratory he provided two
years ago.
At the time, Hammadi was the speaker of Iraq's National
Assembly. "The U.S. administration is now speaking war," Hammadi
said. "We are not going to turn the other cheek. We are going to
fight. Not only our armed forces will fight. Our people will fight."
The date was Sept. 14, 2002. The venue was an ornate room inside
a grand government building in Baghdad. And the gaunt elderly
official was determined to make an impression on the four American
visitors. So, with steel in his voice, Hammadi added: "I personally
will fight."
Looking across the room, I tried to imagine this frail man
pointing a rifle at American troops. He sounded awfully brave. And
who was to say he wouldn't be on the front lines of Iraqi resistance
to the invaders? Yet it was hard to picture him wielding a weapon
against the armed forces of the world's only superpower.
Overall, Hammadi's prediction that "our people will fight" has
come true. A large uprising is underway in Iraq, and not only from
diehard Sunni supporters of the fallen regime. The current Shiite
resistance is debunking the touted expectations from the White House
and the Washington press corps.
And whatever happened to Saadoun Hammadi, the silver-haired
speaker of Saddam Hussein's parliament? Despite his defiant words, he
didn't go down fighting. Some U.S. soldiers captured him last year on
May 29 at his home in Baghdad; he spent three seasons in prison and
then won release in mid-February. Before the month was over, Agence
France Presse reported, Hammadi "found refuge in Jordan." A few
months later, he traveled to Germany for medical treatment.
The contrast between Hammadi's pledge two years ago and his
subsequent behavior may cause us to roll our eyes. But in the United
States, there's no reason for leaders to feel superior.
Powerful men in Washington have long records of supporting wars
for other people to fight. Consider the current media controversy
over the disconnect between George W. Bush's brave words and
self-protective deeds. An unequivocal supporter of the Vietnam War a
third of a century ago, Bush benefitted when influential guardian
angels pulled some strings and got him into the Air National Guard.
Even then, Bush skipped out on some of his obligations, preferring to
have a good time and work for a pro-war congressional candidate in
Alabama.
Since then, George W. Bush never heard of an American-led war he
didn't fervently support (from afar, of course). Likewise, the avidly
pro-war Dick Cheney has explained that he took advantage of several
draft-age deferments and stayed out of the U.S. military during the
war in Vietnam because he had "other priorities."
The prevailing rhetoric insists that any alternative to current
U.S. wars is unthinkable. No less than Saadoun Hammadi two years ago,
the president and vice president like to use the royal "we" when
discussing military action they favor. But the underlying message,
decoded, can be understood as: "Let's you and them fight."
During the next weeks, to a large degree, hopes for the
Bush-Cheney ticket may hinge on the willingness of the news media to
ignore such realities. Historically, the USA's media establishment
has been overly fond of "leadership" in Washington that sends other
people off to kill and be killed -- routinely, as in the case of the
Iraq war, on the basis of lies.
Government officials who glorify other people's patriotic deaths
are rarely eager to partake of such glory themselves. Cases in point:
Saadoun Hammadi. Dick Cheney. George W. Bush.
The White House has tried to distract the news media from
dwelling on the milestone of 1,000 American deaths in Iraq.
Meanwhile, the lethal toll among Iraqi civilians is a media
abstraction. In the U.S. press, those victims -- far more numerous
and no less precious to their loved ones -- go uncounted and unnamed.
___________________________________
Norman Solomon is co-author, with Reese Erlich, of "Target Iraq: What
the News Media Didn't Tell You." His columns and other writings can
be found at .