To Editor:

In the next few weeks Representative Deborah Pryce is expected to vote on a bill (HR 3997).

This bill is being pushed by the big credit bureaus and their lobbyists.

Despite the rampant problem with identity theft, Congress and the big Credit Bureaus are teaming up to pass this legislation that would revoke consumer protection rights.

This bill will overturn dozens of state laws that offer consumers crucial protections against identity theft and financial fraud.

9 million people are the victims of identity theft each year.

1 in 10 Americans are victims of identity theft in their lifetime.

An identity is stolen every 4 seconds in the U.S.

In the last 12 months over 50 million consumer data records were lost.

The average cost to restore a stolen identity $8000.

Representative Deborah Pryce needs to do the right thing for Ohio and vote against this bill.

Sincerely,
Miles Sanger
Grove City, OH
When the House and the Senate pass similar but not identical bills, they create a conference committee to work out the differences.  When they both passed amendments to the "emergency supplemental" spending bill stipulating that none of the money could be used to build permanent bases in Iraq, the conference committee, behind closed doors this week, resolved that non-difference by deleting it. 

This would appear to be a blatant violation of the rules of Congress and an unconstitutional voiding of the will of the people as expressed by their Representatives and Senators.  But it can't appear that way to a people that knows nothing about it.  And it does not appear that way at all to the journalists who inform the public of its government's doings.  Even the minority members of the conference committee and the leaders of the minority party in Congress seem entirely comfortable with this course of events, although Congresswoman Barbara Lee has denounced the Republicans for it.

They got him -- the big, bad, beheading berserker in Iraq.  But, something's gone unreported in all the glee over getting Zarqawi … who invited him into Iraq in the first place?

If you prefer your fairy tales unsoiled by facts, read no further.  If you want the uncomfortable truth, begin with this:  A phone call to Baghdad to Saddam's Palace on the night of April 21, 2003.  It was Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld on a secure line from Washington to General Jay Garner.

The General had arrives in Baghdad just hours before to take charge of the newly occupied nation.  The message from Rumsfeld was not a heartwarming welcome.  Rummy told Garner, Don't unpack, Jack -- you're fired.

What had Garner done?  The many-starred general had been sent by the President himself to take charge of a deeply dangerous mission. Iraq was tense but relatively peaceful.  Garner's job was to keep the peace and bring democracy.

Unfortunately for the general, he took the President at his word.   But the general was wrong.  "Peace" and "Democracy" were the slogans.

In the old days, they'd brandish the head of the captured chieftain from the battlements. These days, given the effects on human bone and tissue of artillery and 500-pound bombs, there's a cull from an old most-wanted list and then, when the morticians have done their work, a photo of the cadaver's visage, decently cleaned up.

When Saddam Hussein's sons, Uday and Qusay, were located and killed in July 2003, connoisseurs of the mortician's arts were particularly impressed by the efforts taken to make them presentable for post-mortem primetime.

At the White House press conference Thursday morning, there was gloating of course, just as there was when Saddam's sons were killed. It takes an effort now to recall that, like the late Zarqawi, Uday and Qusay, too, were credited with inspiring a large part of the resistance, and then, as now, guarded hopes were expressed in Washington that maybe some sort of a corner had been turned.

Officially, ten percent of San Franciscoans live in poverty, and homelessness is a massive problem in the city with the third highest median income in the country. There are more than 6,000 homeless individuals in San Francisco -- and probably more than 8,000. This fact is all the more disturbing considering that San Francisco is ranked the 11th meanest city for the homeless in the country by the National Coalition for the Homeless.

View a photo essay from San Francisco

Find out more information from the Coalition on Homelessness, San Francisco.
How Capitalism Unleashes the Beast of Soulless Avarice

Jinshan Mining Ltd, a leading mineral extraction corporation based in China, has officially announced its ground-breaking technology for extracting gold from the water supply in the United States, including groundwater, rivers, lakes and streams. After years of fastidious research, Jinshan has concluded that most of the water throughout the continental United States contains significant trace levels of gold particles. Its scientists have determined that the concentration of particles is high enough to enable the mining concern’s innovative new extraction process to cull significant quantities of the precious metal from ordinary H2O.

Jinshan, a Chinese multinational, has indicated they have found a surprisingly inexpensive means to process the millions of gallons of American water necessary to reap the profits they seek.

CEO Zhu Jintao was brimming with enthusiasm as he addressed eager members of the US media via satellite link from a remote area of China where he was vacationing with his family:

You can take Greg Palast out of the San Fernando Valley, but you can't take the Valley out of this muckraking journalist.

The longtime Sun Valley resident has become an award-winning investigative reporter for BBC television and Britain's Guardian and Observer newspapers, as well as a New York Times bestselling author, but Palast credits his Valley upbringing with turning him into a prominent critic of President George W. Bush, Enron, globalization, the Iraq war and more. His embittered memories of growing up Valley during the McCarthy and Vietnam eras are anything but "American Graffiti"-like reveries.

"For me, the class war began in the Valley. ... We had this sense that there was a bright city over the hill. Cross Laurel Canyon and you entered the city of the winners. We were in the planet of the losers, below sea level, economically and socially. Most of my area was Chicano. We were the kids who worked at Bob's Big Boy, got your girlfriend pregnant, went to 'Nam - and, if that didn't kill you, overtime at the Chevy plant would."

In 1975 Dorothy T. Samuel published  "Safe Passage on City Streets," a book that examined the state of mind and behavior of people who tended not to get attacked on city streets or tended to walk away unscathed.  She found that the safest people were not those who focused on the danger, not those who walked in fear, and not those who carried weapons – which, as often as not, were turned against them.  The safest people – though there was no guarantee – were people who put danger out of their minds and when attacked reacted with surprise, indignation, or humanity. 

Not to extend Ann Coulter's fame past the news cycle on her latest indescretion but I have to say Bill O'Reilly got it right when noting that people like her make for bad PR for the "convervatives." It makes me wonder what they are conserving? Ann Coulter gives Connecticut Yankee such a bad connotation I want to take the name off the candle.

Conservatives love to talk about the so-called "liberal media" and its influence over the news. But just the opposite is true. And they know it. The media is either dominated by full-fledged kool-aid drinkers like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and Rupert Murdoch, or sympathizers like Wolf Blitzer, Tim Russert, Chris Matthews and, yes, even the NY Times. It's the Repuglicans whose influence dictates the media's direction, and its coverage of both parties.

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS