Advertisement

Events here in Athens are not always accurately reported in the international press. With that in mind, I sent a report to stateside friends Sunday, following the worldwide peace marches. The report, slightly edited below, was based on watching 5.5 hours of live coverage on the second state channel, NET. I also taped the second 'disruption' noted below.

Although not as exciting as being in the actual march, watching the raw TV coverage gave an overview of the event, its proportions and the immediate journalists' reaction to events as they occurred. I did not attempt to be colourful in this report, merely to set down events as I saw them.

Athens
15 February, 03

By police and media estimates, about 150,000 people gathered about noon, on a very chilly day, for just over two hours of speeches and music. The program was followed by another 3 hours of march.

In perspective, that's one of the largest demonstrations here in the past 30 years, and there were parallel events in 20 or more towns around Greece. The crowd included a good number of senior citizens, people who
Since the media has decided to scare everyone with predictions of chemical, biological, or nuclear warfare on our turf, I decided to write a paper and keep things in proper perspective. I am a retired military weapons, munitions, and training expert.

Lesson number one: In the mid 1990s, there were a series of nerve gas attacks on crowded Japanese subway stations. Given perfect conditions for an attack, less than 10% of the people there were injured (the injured were better in a few hours), and only one percent of the injured died.

"60 Minutes" once had a fellow telling us that one drop of nerve gas could kill 1,000 people, well he didn't tell you that the 1,000 dead people per drop was theoretical. Drill Sergeants exaggerate how terrible this stuff was to keep the recruits awake in class (I know this because I was a Drill Sergeant too).

Forget everything you've ever seen on TV, in the movies, or read in a novel about this stuff, it was all a lie (read this sentence again out loud!). These weapons are about terror, if you remain calm, you will probably not die. This is far less scary than the media and their "experts" make it sound.
Connie Hammond, a principal organizer for the Columbus march against war in Iraq last Saturday, estimated that 800 people attended the rally.

Perhaps like me, you watched the evening TV news to see what kind of coverage the protest got. It was dismal. Channels 4, 6 and 10 ran five to ten minutes of stories about snow, followed by about two minutes on the international protests. The local march got about 10 seconds max. Aside from the brevity of the coverage, the message of the protesters was trivialized by focussing on arrests at demos. Perhaps it was just me, but the anchors seemed to editorialize on "what the protesters believe" in such a way as to indicate that the viewer was expected to believe otherwise.

The Dispatch was not much better. Okay, so the Sunday edition had a front page piece "Millions make Case for Peace", which included a whole column-inch telling us where the three central Ohio demos were, but they also ran two pieces to incite war: one on the Iraqi war plan, and one on US proposals to "prove" Iraq is in violation of UNSCR 1441.

President Bush's disparaging remarks yesterday can be found in the headlines of the major cities around the world. This (in and of itself) works great and unexpected wonders as he and the people around him have very nicely legitimized the peace movement. Simple analysis would confirm that matters of irrelevancy simply present no reason for comment (not to mention formal comment with the full power of media at ones' disposal). This administration (in concert with British counterparts) have breathed beautiful life into a large and growing movement. We must seize the opportunities afforded. the nerves of arrogant and insecure leaders have been exposed the light of a common peaceful vision by many people who will not be dissuaded by a campaign of fear or efforts to influence public opinion by the dissemination filtered information to evoke false emotions. This phenomenon has moved the president to call for us to react with social conscience and should compel us to turn up the already searing hot heat as we advocate decency and peace.

Rarely do we receive such engraved invitations. I'm hungry, how about you? Let's eat.
One of the big media buzzwords to emerge in recent years is "globalization." By now, we're likely to know what it means. That's unfortunate -- because at this point the word is so ambiguous that it doesn't really mean much of anything.

News outlets have reported that key international pacts like NAFTA and the World Trade Organization gained U.S. approval during the 1990s because most politicians in Washington favor "globalization." According to conventional media wisdom, those globalizers want to promote unfettered communication and joint endeavors across national boundaries.

Well, not quite. These days, at the White House and on Capitol Hill, the same boosters of "globalization" are upset about certain types of global action -- such as the current grassroots movement against a war on Iraq.

For the most part, the same elected officials and media commentators who have applauded money-driven globalization are now appalled by the sight of anti-war globalization. The recent spectacle of millions of people demonstrating against war on the same day around the world was enough to cause apoplexy at the White House.
AUSTIN, Texas -- Before we all work ourselves into such righteous snits we can't even talk to one another anymore, let's see what we can agree on. Wanting to get rid of Saddam Hussein does not make anyone a bloodthirsty monster or a tool of the oil companies. Being worried to death about the consequences of invading Iraq does not make anyone unpatriotic or in favor of Saddam Hussein.

Whether t'is better to kill the snake or leave the snake alone, that is one question. But the question we're stuck on now is whether there's a better choice. Some of us think containment can work, and the reason we think so is because it already has. More Iraqi weapons were destroyed by U.N. inspectors in the ‘90s than were destroyed by the Gulf War. Why not see if it will work this time? What about a U.N. resolution saying, "Any place Saddam Hussein doesn't let the inspectors go into gets bombed immediately"?

Dylan Hallsmith, a sixth-grade student at St. Michael's School in Montpelier, Vermont, started his own campaign to support Congressman Dennis Kucinich while he considers running for the White House. Called "Kids for Kucinich," the campaign is targeted at young people nationwide, voters and non-voters alike.

"Congressman Kucinich cares about the future, and that's where we're all going to live." Dylan said. "He's concerned about education, the environment, about worker's rights, about civil rights. And most important, he wants to stop war. War is bad for everything." Congressman Kucinich is one of the sponsors of a bill that would create a Department of Peace.

Hallsmith met Kucinich when he came to speak at a Peace Summit at the University of Vermont in September last year. At the Peace Summit, Kucinich talked about how young people need to do something if they want to have a voice in their future. In a dramatic demonstration, Kucinich showed the hundreds of young people who came how one candle can light up a room that was in darkness. "Every voice counts in a democracy," Hallsmith said.
It's getting to be that time of year again- kitten and puppy season. We all know the woes of companion animal overpopulation- unwanted litters of kittens ultimately euthanized, puppies obtained for "bait" in dogfighting circles- so what can be done about it? The most humane and effective way of dealing with this problem has proven to be large scale companion animal sterilization. With this in mind, local shelters, veterinarians, and others have joined with No More Homeless Pets- Central Ohio to repeat The Big Fix: Spay/Neuter Week 2003. The Big Fix enjoyed tremendous success last year, sterilizing over 150 animals during the week of the event, and nearly 100 more over the course of the summer.

Awareness also was brought about by the event that reached thousands of homes regarding issues concerning animal welfare. Mayor Michael Coleman signed a proclamation calling on everyone in Columbus to alter their own pet or that of someone they know.

The Bush administration is helping powerful interests weaken the Clean Air Act's New Source Review program, which forces old, dirty power plants and other facilities to install modern pollution controls. These changes will make it easier for 17,000 facilities to emit more pollution, resulting in more disease, death and damage to the environment.

Recently, there was a vote in U.S. Senate on the Edwards-Lieberman Clean Air Amendment, which would have blocked the first set of White House rollbacks of the New Source Review program. Unfortunately, the U.S. Senate defeated the Edwards Clean Air Amendment by a vote of 46 to 50.

While we didn't win on this vote, this was an impressive vote count that sends a strong message to the White House that the public is opposed to efforts to weaken the Clean Air Act.

The next step is to demonstrate public opposition to the Bush administration's second set of proposed changes to the New Source Review Program. The first set of changes undermines this key clean air protection program, but the second set of proposed rules goes even farther and virtually eliminates the New Source Review program.

Local NPR newscast informs that Attorney General Jim Petro refused to allow the Ohio State University Board of Regents to file an amicus curiae brief (friend of the court) in support of the University of Michigan's position in the two affirmative action cases in front of the US Supreme Court (Gratz v Bollinger, et al. and Grutter v Bollinger et al.) These cases, on appeal from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, challenge the University of Michigan's affirmative action policy. U of M's policy was carefully crafted to meet the requirements of the 1970's Bakke case and if the US Supreme Court rejects the U of M program, affirmative action will be dealt a major setback if not a death blow. The Dispatch carried a New York Times article on Tuesday (2/18) noting that 300 organizations have filed friend of the court briefs in support of the University of Michigan. (page A3)

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS