According to a recent DEA ruling, hemp foods will fall under the category of a Schedule I narcotic after a grace period ending on February 6th, 2002. By that time all retailers and manufacturers are to have disposed of any of their remaining supplies of hemp foods, and already any further manufacture of these products is to have ceased.

This ruling has come about as the DEA is trying to “clarify” the federal language regarding marijuana. Prior to this ruling, there was no official distinction between marijuana and hemp. Now that the DEA has taken care of this little snafu, in typical fashion, what we have left is the endangerment of the fledgling, yet flourishing, hemp industry here in the United States.

The U.S. government, the only government of an industrialized nation to have a ban on the production of industrial hemp, banned marijuana in 1937. However, to this day there are many Americans who do not realize that hemp, the very useful and now THC-free part of the cannabis sativa plant, played a large part in the colonists’ successful boycott of British goods, an act that made a successful American Revolution a reality.

If terrorists turn a US nuclear plant into a radioactive holocaust, the House of Representatives wants you to pay for it. But the Senate can still say otherwise.

The House voted November 28 in virtual secret to shield new reactor builders from normal insurance liability, even if they lack safety domes to contain radioactive releases.

Only a handful of Representatives were present for the vote. Led by Texas Republican Joe Barton and Michigan Democrat John Dingell, HR 2983 sailed through under a “suspension of rules,” traditionally used for unanimous resolutions to rename government buildings, proclaim heroes and commemorate holidays. Facing a barrage of grassroots opposition, a very cynical nuke caucus used the loophole to avoid full debate and hide their votes on the free insurance ride for a new generation of reactors.

Barton received more than $131,590 in utility contributions leading up to the 2000 election. Dingell got $109,679. Dingell is also related by marriage to major partners in Detroit Edison, which built the Fermi nuclear plant at Monroe Michigan. Fermi Unit I, a breeder reactor, nearly exploded in 1966.

In America’s war on terrorism, the first U.S. casualty was the First Amendment. The military, the Bush administration and the media itself have squelched important information about the war in Afghanistan since it began on September 11.

Asked at a press conference whether he would lie to the media about the war, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld repeated this statement by Winston Churchill about misleading information disseminated before and during the D-Day invasion: “Sometimes the truth is so precious it must be accompanied by a bodyguard of lies.”
Unfortunately, Rumsfeld has been the major source of information about the war as reporters’ access to the battlefield has been extremely limited. “They plan to fight the war and then tell the press and the public how it turned out afterwards,” CNN correspondent Jamie McIntyre complained. Others wonder, though, if the American press would tell the full story of the war even if it were free to do so.

News media editorials frequently call for an end to the violence in the Middle East and a return to the peace process by the Palestinians and Israelis. (The Palestinians call it the “piece” process—While the negotiators talk, the Israelis grab a piece of land here, a piece of land there, etc.)

I think it is time the third player in this violent conflict, the U.S. Government, started acting responsibly. And, I believe that is not going to happen until individual American taxpayers begin to periodically—once every three months—write or call their elected officials in Washington. Anything less is a passive endorsement of the status quo.

Following is my sample letter to the President, representative, and both senators:

Dear......

Roughly 30 years ago prison activists began to promote the concept of “alternatives to prisons.” The alternatives they had in mind were halfway houses, probation, and other less punitive forms of supervision and rehabilitation. “Punishment” was viewed as being detrimental to the concept of rehabilitation. “Treatment” was the new buzzword.

Halfway houses three decades ago were places to live until a parolee was able to find a job and save up enough money to rent an apartment. There were no programs and very few restrictions in halfway houses. Basically they were there to assist parolees until they were financially stable.