Sun nite 11/16/08. Few things are as delightful as finding one's ideas corroborated. Thanks for your piece on Common Dreams re GM/transit.

I'm old enough to remember well the deliberate and systematic destruction of L.A.'s not-bad transit system when I was a teenager. Earlier than that, I remember when nearly everyone took public transit--and no one felt low or put- upon.

My favorite examples are RED HARVEST by Dashiell Hammett, in whch the detective (circa 1922) is in a small city--obviously Butte, Montana-- and takes the STREETCAR. And the early post WW II movie STRANGERS ON A TRAIN, in which the characters DO take the train, because there WERE trains. (I STILL take the train whenever possible.)

I also remember the early TV series, when I was about 16, back in the stone age, 77 SUNSET STRIP; that was just about the first one devoted mainly to supposedly glamorous people spending a lot of time driving around in the first generation of new cars after the war--one of the main characters was a parking lot valet.

I'm much bemused: it seems to me 99.9% of ALL environmental stuff I hear on
Thanks Harvey. And BTW: GREAT column.

We have been incensed about this. We watched "Who Killed the Electric Car" right after it came out, and just watched it again last night with my husband's 91 year old father who came to stay for one of his many sojourns from back east. Always a pro-union man, we wanted him to see it, and once again, we were outraged.

Bailing out GM in the name of "our country's best interest" is, in a word, bullshit. They have no compunction, WHATSOEVER, about sacrificing the country's best interest in terms of lining their pockets.

No bailout. UNLESS... they sign an airtight contract ASAP that they will create ASAP energy efficient public transportation that is zero impact on the environment. A hard standard to live up to but... JFK got us to the moon in less than a decade after his pronouncement. We think GM is capable of that.... and MORE. Especially if they can shred energy-efficient automobiles w/o a blink.

Thanks for your voice, your columns, your wisdom...

Keep up the great work,

Theresa, Howard,
And our kids.... Sarah, Izaak and Emm
As the sun sets on Bush 2, it is clear that a very thin line of electoral protection preserved Barack Obama's victory in Ohio---and the nation.

And it's no accident the vote count battle for a Columbus-area Congressional seat still rages.

The GOP's 2008 electoral strategy again emphasized massive voter disenfranchisement and rigging the electronic vote count. The twin tactics very nearly gave Ohio to McCain/Palin, and threatened to set precedents capable of winning them the national election.

Prior to the 2004 vote, Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell stripped some 308,000 Ohio citizens from the registration rolls in heavily Democratic districts. This mass disenfranchisement alone may have accounted for the 118,000-plus official margin that gave George W. Bush a second term in the White House.

After the 2004 vote, Blackwell disenfranchised another 170,000 voters in heavily Democratic Franklin County (Columbus).

Target: G8 Leaders: Developing nations struggle to provide healthcare, education and HIV and AIDS prevention/treatment for their citizens. Debt relief or debt cancellation gives the opportunity for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) to reprioritize funds and focus on development, creating programs and opportunities that benefit their citizens. Debt relief already has proven successful in parts of Africa.

For example, after recent debt cancellation, Nigeria now expects to employ 120,000 new teachers enabling 3.5 million children to receive an education. In Tanzania the number of children receiving primary education has doubled. They are making excellent use of 1,000 new schools and 31,000 new schoolrooms. Choosing to relieve the debt of HIPC will not hurt those countries receiving debt payments because the payments are insignificant in comparison to the powerhouse economies of the lenders. It is time to help the world's poorest by giving HIPC the chance to develop. Tell the G8 world leaders to act in a timely manner forgiving debt to all indebted nations.

Take Action
There’s good news for unions attempting to attract the young members that they must attract if they are to grow. It comes in recent studies showing clearly that younger workers do better as union members and that increasing numbers of the workers agree.

The basic figures, compiled by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, certainly are convincing. Unionized workers aged 18 to 29 averaged about $15 an hour -- more than 12 percent or about $1.75 an hour more than non-union workers of the same age.

What’s more, 40 percent of the unionized workers had employer-financed health care, while only 20 percent of those outside unions had such benefits. Almost 30 percent of those in unions had pension plans, only 11 percent of those outside. Most of the unionized workers also had such other benefits as paid holidays and vacations.

The contrast was even greater for workers in the 15 lowest paid jobs, including kitchen helpers, housekeepers, laborers, security guards, stock clerks, teachers’ aides, child- care providers and others. The median pay of young unionized workers in those jobs was about $11 an hour, nearly $2
I think the peace movement and every justice movement in the United States should simply overwhelm Congress members during the next two months with one and only one demand: Pass the Employee Free Choice Act in January. This is, of course, the bill that the labor movement has been trying to pass for years, and that Democrats in Congress and President Elect Obama have committed to making law: http://aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca

My second day on the scooter I was a little too sure of myself.

My other bike, after all, is an aging V-twin 750cc Yamaha Virago (currently in need of repairs I can't afford) so how mean could a little 150cc scoot be? I twisted the throttle too fast in a parking lot and learned in an instant that my new eco-friendly ride has more pep than I realized, and doesn't turn as tightly as a motorcycle. Zooming right toward a parked car - a nice one - I had to drop the bike intentionally to avoid hitting it.

Both my new bike and my old ego emerged bruised, but luckily no serious injury to either.

To American motorists accustomed to the relative safety of gigantic SUVs and sedans, scootering is a dangerous proposition: The money you save on gas, maintenance, purchase price and insurance can dissipate in an instant with one bad move - yours, the other guy's or an act of Goddess.

Bail out General Motors? The people who murdered our mass transit system?

First let them remake what they destroyed.

GM responded to the 1970s gas crisis by handing over the American market to energy-efficient Toyota and Honda.

GM met the rise of the hybrids with “light trucks.”

GM built a small electric car, leased a pilot fleet to consumers who loved it, and then forcibly confiscated and trashed them all.

GM now wants to market a $40,000 electric Volt that looks like a cross between a Hummer and a Cadillac and will do nothing to meet the Solartopian needs of a green-powered Earth.

For this alone, GM’s managers should never be allowed to make another car, let alone take our tax money to stay in business.

But there is also a trillion-dollar skeleton in GM’s closet.

This is the company that murdered our mass transit system.

The assertion comes from Bradford Snell, a government researcher whose definitive report damning GM has been a vehicular lightening rod since its 1974 debut. Its attackers and defenders are legion. But some facts are irrefutable:
I am writing this as someone who joins Americans and others across this planet in their elation over your victory.

Many of us want to join with you in working to solve the challenges that you, our nation and the world face. One of them is the decision you will make about Iran. According to Carol Giacomo’s article “ New Beltway Debate: What to Do About Iran” in the November 3, 2008 issue of the New York Times, a range of military and economic options against Iran are being considered by your new administration.

Because of the magnitude and possible repercussions of the decision you will ultimately make I encourage you to seek out a range of informed opinions on this subject to supplement the guidance you receive from your advisors.

One such source could be the current and past members of the upper echelons of our military who opposed the plans for such an attack under the Bush administration, some of whom resigned in protest or threatened to do so. In addition, available to you are the opinions of many groups that have carried on a campaign to prevent the Bush administration from attacking Iran.

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS