Advertisement

"In one corner of the little room a couple of mops, with stiff, clotted, foul-smelling heads stand near a rusty bucket. . . . In the room a child is sitting. It could be a boy or a girl. It looks about six, but actually is nearly ten. It is feeble-minded. Perhaps it was born defective, or perhaps it has become imbecile through fear, malnutrition, and neglect. It picks its nose and occasionally fumbles vaguely with its toes or genitals, as it sits hunched in the corner farthest from the bucket and the two mops. It is afraid of the mops."
- Ursula K. Le Guin, "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas"

Now that even Republicans are gagging on the war on terror, as lavish descriptions of psychosis-level torture seep into the mainstream - and as a flailing, unpopular president clings in the face of reason to his right to maintain a gulag of "enemy combatants" (for God's sake, George, most of them are innocent) - Americans are finding themselves on the brink of the moral debate they've been trying to avoid for the last, oh, 50 years or so. It's been brewing my whole lifetime.

Dear Editor:

Although polls have shown that 70% of voters are against privatization of Social Security, President Bush is resurrecting his attempt to pass that terrible scheme. Privatization of 4% of the 12 ½% withholding tax would destroy Social Security.  It is a safety net, not a savings plan. We have plenty of advantageous  government savings plans: IRAs, Roth IRAs, 401Ks etc.

Many Republican Senators and Representatives vigorously supported Bush’s plan until polls showed that voters were against privatization when they became informed. They then softened their stand. Now that the election is near they say that they want to strength Social Security.

How Social Security works: Each month money from withholding tax not required for benefits is loaned to the general  fund in return for non -negotiable bonds which earn interest at the rate of  10-year government bonds, now about  4%. It is very unlikely, but if ever there is a need for more money to go out  as benefits than is coming in from withholding tax, these bond would be redeemed. 

Unless things have changed drastically since the June 13, 2004 NYT editorial "Gambling on Voting" was published, and all indications are that they haven't, I'll be voting by absentee ballot.

There needs to be a national regulatory standard for all electronic voting systems that is at least as robust as Nevada's regulatory standards for electronic gaming systems.

The Nevada State Gaming Commission has access to all gambling software, and this software is being contiuously spot-checked against copies of the software kept by the Commission. Incidentally, it is illegal for casinos to use any software not on file with the Commission. Gambling machines must be resistant to electrostatic shocks as high as 20,000 volts, and they must be physically tamper resistant. Any attempt to physically tamper with the machines locks the machine which must be manually reset after it has been shown to be operating properly. It has been demonstrated, repeatedly, that current electronic voting systems can be physically hacked, with no trace of the hack ever being made apparent.

It's personal for a lot of people. 9-11. So personal Keith Olberman wrote an essay on why it's personal to him. It's personal to me.

September 11, 2001. My mother, who was born in the city at Cornell Med was in the city staying at my sister's apartment then.

She and her friend were on the way to the World Trade Center as part of a tour. They overslept so did not get there as planned right at 8:30. They got to the Metro late and were turned away just as they were shutting down the metro at West 72nd street. September 11, 2001.

A plane allegedly went down in the next podunct town in Pennsylvania to where I spent summers on a lake at my grandparents house. Indian Lake. Shanksville. Who the heck ever heard of these places? I did. I knew it so well I knew that the official story of a plane plumetting and disappearing into liquid earth of a reclaimed coal field with body parts floating in the lake five to ten miles upstream made zero sense unless the plane exploded or was shot down.   

Dear Mr. Cockburn,

I have often been called a conspiracy theorist myself for not accepting the readily available reasons the mainstream media likes to present for a variety of national and international issues.

I didn’t believe there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq (largely because UN and American weapons inspectors said there were none), nor that there were links between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda; nor did I believe that George W Bush won the 2000 or the 2004 election fairly, all of which leads friends and acquaintances to call me (as they have done many times in the past) a conspiracy theory nut – even though I don’t really think questioning those incidents qualifies me as a conspiracy nut.

Perhaps you’ve heard of the school lab experiment of putting a frog in a pan of cool water, putting the pan over a burner, and slowly raising the water to boiling, killing the frog. The frog doesn’t notice the temperature changing and, rather than jumping out of the pan, falls asleep as the water warms up.

Experts across the country, from Princeton to MIT, have found serious security flaws in these electronic voting systems forced on us by HAVA (Help American "Vendors" Act). We citizens were forced to pay private corporations $3.8 billion to privatize our elections. "Privatize" in this case means the vote count is kept secret from public observation.  Electronic voting systems are unfit for use in any democracy. 

There are 120 ways to hack the vote on a computer; there are 5 ways to hack a Hand-Counted Paper Ballot system.  See the resource list below for links to these reports. At the very least, please read the executive summaries. 

Election integrity is a non partisan issue.  Republican Governor of Maryland, Bob Ehrlich, estimated electronic voting represents a 1000% increase in cost. HCPB is the most accurate, the most secure and by far the least expensive voting system.

We must return to a citizen count of paper ballots, at the precinct, before all who wish to observe. To participate in a Parallel Election being run in Central Ohio, contact me or my cohort, Marj Creech, at risenregan @ earthlink.net.

Dear Mr Cockburn,

I would like to agree with you over 9/11, but there are problems.  I also agree that there are more than enough wingnut theories flying around and they should be ignored.  However, having studied the way the twin towers and building 7 came down, I cannot explain them without benefit of thermite.  I am not a structural engineer, but I can understand the basic facts of the construction of the twin towers. 

They snapped back upright after each impact, therefore the central steel structure could not have been that damaged.  Also, if it had been, the upper floors would have started to sag at once, and they didn't.  Kerosene burns at approximately 1000 degrees (I'm sorry, for the moment I cannot remember if that is F or C, but for the purposes of this argument, it doesn't matter) lower than the temperature at which steel starts to weaken.  You only have to look at the video of that day to see that it is thick black smoke coming out of the towers, not white hot flame.  Black smoke is a sign of low level combustion which shows that the fire could not possibly have been at a tenperature to melt the steel core.  

AUSTIN, Texas -- Some country is about to have a Senate debate on a bill to legalize torture. How weird is that?

I'd like to thank Sens. John McCain, Lindsay Graham -- a former military lawyer -- and John Warner of Virginia. I will always think fondly of John Warner for this one reason: Forty years ago, this country was involved in an unprovoked and unnecessary war. It ended so badly the vets finally had to hold their own homecoming parade, years after they came home. The only member of Congress who attended was John Warner.

A debate on torture. I don't know -- what do you think? I guess we have to define it, first. The White House has already specified "water boarding," making some guy think he's drowning for long periods, as a perfectly good interrogation technique. Maybe, but it was also a great favorite of the Gestapo and has been described and condemned in thousands of memoirs and novels in highly unpleasant terms.

AUSTIN, Texas -- Is it just me, or was that the worst presidential press conference in history? So I went back and read it over. Of course, in print you don't get the testy tone: I heard it on radio and thought the man was about to blow up -- not just because he was being questioned, which Bush appears to consider an offensive action in the first place, but because people continue to refuse to see things the way he does. How can they be so stupid or malign, he appears to wonder.

I ask: How can he be so repetitive, repeatedly using the oldest tactic of a verbal bully -- saying the same thing louder, as though that would make it true?

Last Friday's Rose Garden press conference seemed so awful I thought it worth wading through it again to see what set him off. Maybe if you saw it on television, it seemed better. Perhaps his banter with reporters works better on TV. But I left with the impression that this is a spoiled man whose frustration level when someone disagrees with him is that of a 3-year-old and that he's the last person you want to see operating under a lot of stress because he doesn't handle it well.

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS