We sure have our priorities right in this country of ours. According to my daily habit, I flipped on the TV after an early lunch at about 11:45 this morning, E.S.T. Thought I’d check on the latest developments in Iraq, Lebanon, and Capitol Hill. I started with CNN, then flipped over to Fox, then MSNBC.

None of three had anything to say about international or domestic affairs. All were maintaining a breathless vigil outside a courtroom in Santa Maria, California, because Michael Jackson, whose name is somehow still preceded by the adjective “superstar,” had decided to stop at a hospital en route to his trial for child molestation. It seems the single-gloved wonder was suffering back pains that had required emergency treatment; unfortunately, he didn’t have permission from the court to show up late.

President Bush recently nominated Stephen L. Johnson, a 24-year veteran of the Environmental Protection Agency, to be the agency’s new administrator.  Mr. Johnson has been the acting administrator since January, and prior to that oversaw the EPA office handling pesticides and other toxic substances. In nominating Johnson, Mr. Bush described him as “a talented scientist” and having “good judgment and complete integrity.”

Yet his record as the Assistant Administrator for Toxic Substances casts serious doubt on whether he is suited to lead the E.P.A., an agency directly affecting Americans’ health and many significant industries, including automobiles and agriculture. During President Bush’s first term, Johnson was a strong supporter of pesticide testing on humans.

Wow, what a tangled web you weave!  George H.W. Bush "took over" the CIA under Gerald Ford!  I actually think Ford appointed him, he was CIA director only briefly (less than a year, if I recall), and at that point, there was no consideration of the former one-term Congressman as a vice presidential candidate.  In fact, he only became vice president under Reagan due to Reagan's (misguided) belief in compromise after the 1980 nomination fight.

  And to tie Prescott Bush into it, along with the various 1950s CIA coups, really strains credulity.  Guys, that all happened almost 50 years ago!  Yes, a few folks tried to call John Kennedy a Fascist because his father was pro-Hitler, but that didn't stick, and neither will your charges.

  Bush won, he's president.  Get over it.  You'll have another chance in four years.  In the meantime, stop wasting other people's time and money on court challenges to the election results.  I hope Ohio disbars your lawyers.

Randolph R. Resor
Merchantville, NJ
Byrd equates Bush with Hitler.  Senator Byrd is right I was 12 years old when World War 11 began and I remember the newsreels showing the people hailing Hitler.  The 50% of people who voted for Bush are doing the same for Bush.

I would not be surprised if the next election is suspended for some unknown reason and Bush will remain in power for years to come.

The American people have their heads in the sand and refuse to see the writing on the wall. 

Alice Dartt
Greenville, Alabama
Sadly, it has come to this. Two years after the invasion of Iraq, the online powerhouse MoveOn.org -- which built most of its member base with a strong antiwar message -- is not pushing for withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

With a network of more than 3 million “online activists,” the MoveOn leadership has decided against opposing the American occupation of Iraq. During the recent bloody months, none of MoveOn’s action alerts have addressed what Americans can do to help get the U.S. military out of that country. Likewise, the MoveOn.org website has continued to bypass the issue -- even after Rep. Lynn Woolsey and two dozen cosponsors in the House of Representatives introduced a resolution in late January calling for swift removal of all U.S. troops from Iraq.

That resolution would seem to be a natural peg for the kind of kinetic activism that established MoveOn’s reputation. A movement serious about ending U.S. military activities in Iraq could use the resolution as a way to cut through political tap dances and pressure members of Congress to take a stand. Down the road, generating grassroots support for a get-out-of-Iraq
Beware the stranger bearing gifts. Or as the law teaches, caveat emptor, buyer beware. Look before you leap. All these warnings apply to the emerging Republican positioning on the Voting Rights Act.

Forty years ago, after the bloody march in Selma, Ala., Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which requires that states with a history of discrimination get pre-approval from the Justice Department for any changes in their voting procedures.

This was a great victory for the movement that Dr. Martin Luther King led. Give us the vote, King taught, and we can begin to change America. As African Americans were able to register and vote and segregation slowly came to an end, a new South was created. The New South became a center of investment.

Politics changed, too. As Lyndon Johnson predicted when he signed the Voting Rights Act, Democrats paid a great price for being the party of progress. In the South, Republicans made themselves the party of white sanctuary. The current Republican majorities in the House and Senate are founded on the racial politics of the South.

Hi Free Press:

Thank you so much for continuing to fight for fair elections.  

I have one suggestion to make.  I have been a computer programmer for 30 years.  Believe me - voting machines are a much simpler application than ATMs.  

So, if companies like Diebold who make both types of machines say that it is too difficult to produce paper receipts and an audit log we should be able to easily debunk this nonsense. That is, we should do is keep reminding the public that ATMs produce these audit trails and that Diebold and others' claims are nonsense.  

People can easily understand this when using the ATM analogy.

Helen W Slater

I just cannot see for the life of me how the majority of citizens here in Ohio, and America are buying into the deceitful antics of the Republican Party, including the ones who are so hard right on their American views and standards. Look at what's going on, gas prices are higher than ever before. The president is talking about "adjusting" the socialk security system by privatizing it. Our schools and libraries are losing their funding. And we're still losing jobs. Worse yet, religion-oriented people care more about abortion, national security, and stem-cell than they are about the future of our children, the poor, the underemployed, the unemployed, the underprivileged, and the uninsured. What is this country coming to? As I recall, in a political campaign ad put on by the Bush Administration and conservatives like "best-selling journalism author" Ann Coulter and 300-lb Southern GOP-supporting "shock jock" Ben Ferguson (who wrote a book tiled "It's My America Too", Republicans were blaming John Kerry and his "liberals in Congress" for the cause of job loss, underfunded education, and outrageous gas price inflation. Wrong, I don't think so!! I think the GOP
AUSTIN, Texas -- I must confess, I have sadly underestimated the Bush administration's sense of humor. Appointing John Bolton ambassador to the United Nations: boffo! What a laff riot! Hilarious comedy, a delicious romp, great setup for a sit-com.

Bolton is known for being arrogant, humorless, self-righteous and confrontational, and he hates the United Nations. In other words, the perfect diplomat.

Speaking of setups, would the joke be half as good if President Bush hadn't just returned from a tour of Europe during which he assured our allies he was anxious to improve international cooperation? There, he was promising Europeans old and new that we'd turned a new page, we want nothing more than consultation, cooperation, being buddy-buddy. And then he names Bolton ambassador (oh, ha ha) to the United Nations (ha, ha, ha). Bolton keeps a bronzed grenade in his office to show how proud he is of being called a bomb-thrower.

Without his make-up, Dan looked like hell warmed over: old, defeated, yet angry. And he told our television audience something that just blew me away. Dan Rather said that American reporters may not ask tough questions about George Bush or his wars.

"It's an obscene comparison," Rather said, "but there was a time in South Africa when people would put flaming tires around peoples' necks if they dissented. In some ways, the fear is that you will be neck-laced here, you will have a flaming tire of lack of patriotism put around your neck."

Talking to another reporter, Dan told it straight about the careerism that keeps US journalists in line. "It's that fear that keeps [American] journalists from asking the toughest of the tough questions and to continue to bore-in on the tough questions so often."

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS