Advertisement

In the coming weeks, the Senate will attempt to make a compelling argument for opening up the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling. It turns out that tapping into ANWR’s resources would produce an immediate 600,000 barrels per day of oil—exactly the same amount of oil the U.S. currently purchases from Iraq under the United Nations oil for food program.

  The U.N. Security Council set up the oil-for-food program in August 1990 after Iraq invaded Kuwait and the U.N then imposed comprehensive sanctions on the country. The program was aimed at removing some of the hardships placed on Iraqi civilians as a result of the sanctions. Since then, the U.S. has resented the fact that it has had to purchase Iraqi oil, which is crucial to our country’s overall supply, from Saddam Hussein who Bush Administration officials claim uses the money to fund his military and uses very little to reduce the suffering of innocent Iraqi’s affected by the sanctions.

 
Has the Bush Administration suckered the United Nations into weakening Iraq prior to a mass murderous attack that was pre-ordained years ago?

The facts are these:

· Bush's original official stance was that the United Nations must force Iraq to disarm, in keeping with treaties signed after Iraq's 1991 defeat after invading Kuwait.  His charges that Iraq had failed to honor these promises led the United Nations to force it to further disarm;

· According to the official report of UN weapons inspectors, as delivered Friday, March 7 by Hans Blix, Iraq has made "significant" steps toward disarming, among other things destroying many of its missiles;

· According to additional reports, Iraq may have destroyed most or all of its chemical and biological weapons early in the 1990s;

· According to most credible reports, Iraq does not have the near-term ability to build nuclear weapons;

In short, by all internationally accepted standards, Iraq has moved toward significant compliance with the formal demands of the United Nations, and cannot be considered a credible threat to the United States.

Adapted from Ramsey Clark's (Former U.S. Attorney General) address to the half a million demonstrators at the January 18th National March on Washington to Stop the War on Iraq organized by International A.N.S.W.E.R. (Act Now to Stop War & End Racism).

The U.S. Constitution provides the means for preventing George W. Bush from engaging in a war of aggression against Iraq, and from advancing a first strike potentially nuclear preemptive war. It's called impeachment.

High Crimes and Misdemeanors
Impeachment is the direct constitutional means for removing a President, Vice President or other civil officers of the United States who has acted or threatened acts that are serious offenses against the Constitution, its system of government, or the rule of law, or that are conventional crimes of such a serious nature that they would injure the Presidency if there was no removal.

A Constitutional Imperative
Columbus Public Schools Acting Internal Auditor Philip Watson’s 7-page summary and report explains why Columbus School Board member William Moss pounded his shoe on the table disrupting the February 4, 2003 Columbus School Board meeting.

An assessment of the mainstream press’ news and commentary surrounding Moss’ imitation of Nikita Khrushchev suggests that only the Columbus Dispatch’s Bill Bush looked past Moss’ tactics to the substance of his complaint. Columbus Dispatch columnist Barbara Carmen, despite the availability of the Watson’s 7-page report, completely ignored its contents, as did The Other Paper’s News Editor Dan Williamson and Alive columnist Jeff Winbush.

Moss told the Free Press in an interview that his outburst was motivated by what he saw as "collusion" between accounting and consulting firm KPMG and Computer Science Corporation (CSC). Moss points out that as former head of the School Board’s Technology Committee, he recommended pulling the CSC contract from the agenda.

Insider info for bid

Former President George Bush predicted in 1996 that if the United States were to engage in another war with Iraq, one aimed at overthrowing Saddam Hussein, the “entire Arab world would turn against us” and the U.S. would alienate its allies in the international community.

“To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us, and make a broken tyrant into a latter-day Arab hero," Bush said in an interview with the BBC marking the five-year anniversary of the Gulf War.

Moreover, Vice President Dick Cheney said at an energy conference six years ago that hundreds of thousands of United States soldiers and Iraqi civilians would die if a war in Iraq were ever fought on the streets of Baghdad.

“To have brought the (Gulf) war into the populous Iraqi capital of Baghdad where Hussein is based would have involved a different type of military operation than in the desert, and would have put large numbers of Iraqi civilians and hundreds of thousands of our troops at risk of being killed,” he said.

Three days after a British newspaper revealed a memo about U.S. spying on U.N. Security Council delegations, I asked Daniel Ellsberg to assess the importance of the story. "This leak," he replied, "is more timely and potentially more important than the Pentagon Papers."

The key word is "timely." Publication of the secret Pentagon Papers in 1971, made possible by Ellsberg's heroic decision to leak those documents, came after the Vietnam War had already been underway for many years. But with all-out war on Iraq still in the future, the leak about spying at the United Nations could erode the Bush administration's already slim chances of getting a war resolution through the Security Council.

"As part of its battle to win votes in favor of war against Iraq," the London-based Observer reported on March 2, the U.S. government developed an "aggressive surveillance operation, which involves interception of the home and office telephones and the e-mails of U.N. delegates." The smoking gun was "a memorandum written by a top official at the National Security Agency -- the U.S. body which intercepts
Join the merry White House crew---Shrub, Dick, Karl, John and Tom---as they joke and yell their way toward the Apocalypse.  Never has government been so much fun...

PRESIDENT BUSH: (Yelling): WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON? Where's my war? I want my war!

VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY: Calm down, George. We've got some problems.

PRESIDENT BUSH: We have NO problems. We are prepared to attack. I say it's time to attack. Billy Graham says it's time to attack. God says it's time to attack. Armageddon won't wait.

KARL ROVE: Well, George, I'm afraid we're no longer on such firm ground. The latest polls here show that 70% of the American public want us to get UN approval before we go to war.

PRESIDENT BUSH: I took care of that already. I said those ridiculous peace marches were irrelevant. We're not running this government by focus group. We're not running this war by some damn hippie pinko peace marchers. We're running it by George W. Bush and the word of God as brought to Earth by the Reverend Billy Graham.

The Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH) strongly condemns the latest Israeli aggression against the Palestinian people, in which Israeli troops, backed by tanks and helicopter gun ships, killed 11 Palestinians and wounded 140 in Jabalia refugee camp close to Gaza city.

Israeli forces carried out an incursion into the camp in the early hours of this morning, Thursday March 6th, 2003, targeting civilians and firing indiscriminately at residential buildings in the camp. Eyewitnesses said that Israeli tanks fired at Palestinian residents of the camp attempting to remove furniture from a woodworks shop which was set on fire by tank shells. At that point, 8 Palestinians were killed and at least 30 were injured.

Palestinian medical personnel and eyewitness accounts in Jabalia camp also confirmed that Israeli helicopter gun ships killed a 60 year old Palestinian man outside his home. Al-Shifa hospital in Gaza city finally confirmed that the total number of people killed during the assaults reached 11; with more than 140 injured (40 of whom are suffering from critical and/or irrecoverable injuries).

I just want to crawl away
into some dark place
Where no war can touch me
No person can harm me
Somewhere so I can't
see the face
of those who blame
and judge
And stare at me with
their eyes
Daggers of truth cutting
Dabbing blood with only lies
Where timing isn't necessary
Statues of stone representing self
Emotions carelessly stacked
A place to mourn
A place to shelf
away my fears
A place where I am praised
to show tears
I can dive into
my own sadness
madness
and mourn
my innocence lost
and rediscover the meaning
of yet another
lost year


A place where babies are safe
to be born
Safe to bare
Where I could be a mother
and not have to care
or spend my time
Waiting
Anticipating
and hating
myself for being weak
For choosing the abortionist's chair
Strapped myself in
I gave away the part of me
that may just have had
a chance
Sacrificed my baby
so that in this youth

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS