Recent decisions by the Federal Communications Commission and a federal appeals court are likely to unleash another round of media consolidation that will put even more constraints on journalists and threaten media access and diversity.

Background

In 2001 over 12,000 Central Ohio residents signed a petition saying they wanted a vote at the ballot box in the City of Columbus on a moratorium to stop new City sewer and water service into the Big Darby Watershed. In October of 2001 the Franklin County Board of Elections certified that enough of those signatures were valid City voters to meet the requirements of the City Charter. Columbus City Council then voted in October to put the issue on the May ballot, according to the dictates of the Charter. That same Charter requires the Clerk of Council to immediately send the petition to the Board of Elections.

When Gary Webb was coming up, news reporting was a noble virtue. There was a lot to get excited about-black power, queer and women's rights, state marijuana decriminalization measures, and most importantly, a war that nobody wanted. During this journalistic golden age of the '60s and early '70s, politics came across a little more real. Democrats and Republicans bore some discernible differences-distinctions that were hard to ascertain during the 2000 presidential election, since reporters rarely strayed from the course of topics prescribed by party strategists. Find a pundit today who thinks prescription drugs for seniors is America's most pressing social issue if you doubt the two-party influence on the media.

Animosity between India and Pakistan is spread over the past half a century, more or less equal to the total life of both South Asian nuclear neighbors. During this time, both the countries fought two full-scale wars (1965 and 1971) and two mini-wars (1948 and 1999). Interestingly, the two minor and one full-scale wars were fought over the issue of Kashmir, a state in the extreme north of south Asia. Both India and Pakistan claim their right over Kashmir. The war of 1971 split Pakistan into two halves, thus paving the way for the creation of present day Bangladesh.

Background of present conflicts

To understand the present stand-off between India and Pakistan, we must refer to the past that will guide us again to the present.

Akin to Europe, the sub-continent or south Asia (present day India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) as it is now being called, has never been under a single political authority in the annals of history. On the contrary, this part of the world remained divided into various empires, princely states and kingdoms in the past. Before 1947, there were no such countries as Pakistan, Bangladesh or India.

Even while the U.S. Congress votes to give its power over to the President to regulate international trade and commerce (via the "Fast Track" vote), citizens across the nation and the world are building the broad-based agenda by which we reclaim our commons, our children's future, and a world that works for all life. Corporate-managed globalization is NOT inevitable and is all about who decides and who wins or loses.

U.S. House of Representatives to get second chance to say "NO" to Trade Deals

Background: Last fall, the U.S. House of Representatives gave President Bush a green light to negotiate trade and investment deals, diminishing their power to ensure safeguards in the deals for health, safety and environmental concerns. Known as "Fast Track" or "Trade Promotion Authority," (the current administration's attempt to whitewash the name which the Republicans during the Clinton years took great pains to cast in a negative light,) the authority enables the ever-widening scope and reach of these international agreements to venture into new terrain with ever-decreasing power of citizens to participate in any meaningful way.

Authorities tell us that the world changed on September 11. As a result, university professors must watch what they say in class or be turned in to the "speech" police. Elected officials must censor themselves or be censured by the media. Citizens now report behavior of suspicious-looking people to the police. Laws now exist that erode our civil liberties. Americans now accept these infringements as necessary to win America's New War.

America, the world's only superpower, is stifled in its ability to defend human rights and democracy abroad because it has failed the fundamental test at home. Our combination of money and military might, and our willingness to use them, did not make us a superpower. We are the most powerful nation on the face of the planet because we have combined raw power with American ideals such as dignity, freedom, justice, and peace. These ideas and ideals are admired around the world and are more important, in my view, to our position of global strength than our ability to shoot a missile down a chimney. We might be feared because of our military, but we are loved because of our ideals.

We've arrived at the 30-year milestone of Watergate, though calling it an anniversary is a bit too celebratory for me. Watergate started as a bungled break-in but became a symbol of abuse of presidential powers: break-ins, wiretapping newsmen, illegal campaign contributions, selling ambassadorships and covering it all up.

At the time of Watergate, I was in my early 30s and serving as counsel to the president. Today, I look back on those years and realize how unique my opportunity was. There were more good days than bad, more happy days than sad. Yet the bad and sad have a way of sticking in one's memory.

The bad days were when I learned that the president was deeply involved in the Watergate cover-up and my warning of a cancer on his presidency failed to evoke the response I'd hoped and planned. The sad days were when I had to testify against my friends and former colleagues. Watergate wasn't a tragedy; it was a disaster.

It was a Nuremburg moment. Fueled by the 911 "terrorist attack," Ohio State University graduates, their families, and friends were mostly in the same frame of mind as Germans after the burning of the Reichstag: they were all geeked up for simple-minded nationalistic jingoism which Resident George W. Bush supplied. The Selected One dotted the i on a big-ol' script Ohio so big that Osama bin Laden could read it.

I ran into Yoshie Furuhashi at Hempfest on the Saturday before the June 14 graduation/indoctrination to the New World Reich rally. As usual, she was in hyperactivism mode. I did manage to catch the following words: "wouldya like to be a alternativecommencementspeaker at the turnyourbackonbush rally, bring your soundsystem?" I agreed to Yoshie's request as I always do. After all, she's being honored at Community Festival this year for her energetic and consistent activism at OSU this past year.

There’s good and bad news on the animal rights front. Here’s our investigative correspondent Iggy to bring us the latest news:

Jesse Helms – man or mouse?

AUSTIN, Texas -- There' some stiff competition in the Stupidest Thing Said Yet department about the swoon in the financial markets. But among the heavy contenders we must surely count those who are now saying they know who's responsible, and it is us.

According to this theory, you, me and Joe Doaks made Ken Lay do it. Came as a surprise to me, too. Naturally, as a liberal, I just love guilt, so I was ready to sign right up for this one, but try as I may, I can't get it to make a lick of sense. Nevertheless, several of our heavy ponderers and The Wall Street Journal's editorial page insist that we did it.

It seems "we," a word they use rather promiscuously in my opinion, were seized by greed and folly in the '90s. "We" were so stupid we thought stock markets only went up, and "we" are whining like children only because "we" don't understand that in the big, tough, he-man world of capitalism, we must take risks.

Who you callin' "we," white man?

Let me count the ways this one is a crock. It's not as though the 1990s are exactly lost in the mists of time here. Children

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS