Advertisement

After the November presidential election, as informal accounts of massive voting irregularities began to surface, Columbus citizens organized public hearings to document and investigate the reports. Some national organizations had huge amounts of documentation that were to be used for future litigation and public policy changes to effect changes for future election cycles, but not to respond to this one. Organizers felt there needed to be an immediate public conversation about our local and statewide election administration with democratic access to the evidence of voting irregularities; a place for ordinary people- not just lawyers- to respond to the situation. Over 750 Ohioans attended the hearings where sworn testimony was gathered from voters, poll watchers, election experts, and investigative journalists.

The public hearings kicked off a host of widespread challenges to local and statewide election administration, as well as a growing public response of outrage and demand for accountability. The goals of this campaign were to address investigate and document voting irregularities, demand a recount, hold
Although the Franklin County recount went relatively smoothly on the surface, it was hardly the meaningful audit it was meant to be. The statewide recount didn't change the results of the election in any drastic way, because the process ensured that it wouldn't. A look at the Franklin County recount shows some reasons why, although the recount procedure varied from county to county.

Direct Recording Equipment Issues

In Ohio counties that used DRE (Electronic) voting machines lacking a voter-verifiable paper trail, local Boards of Elections were allowed to decide what it meant to them to conduct a recount. There is no up-to-date Ohio state law to regulate the DRE recount process. In Franklin County, the Cobb campaign submitted a list of requests, asking that representatives of candidates have the opportunity to examine:

-Internal audit trails, printouts, and vote logs from each voting machine used 11/2, and from the central tabulator.

-All logs of the date, time, purpose and identity of persons who applied and removed security seals on each voting machine used in the election; similar
AUSTIN, Texas -- A substantial nit to pick with President Bush's second Inaugural Address and some questions about his theme.

"From the day of our founding, we have proclaimed that every man and woman on this earth has rights, and dignity, and matchless value, because they bear the image of the maker of heaven and earth. Across the generations we have proclaimed the imperative of self-government, because no one is fit to be a master, and no one deserves to be a slave."

Oh dear. It took us almost 100 years to get rid of slavery right here in the Land of the Free, it took us another 100 years to get rid of legal discrimination based on race and gender, and how long it will take us to achieve equal opportunity for all in this country no one can say. At least we're working at it. Or we were.

The Bush theme of what someone else christened "evangelical democracy" is rather like the "From the day of our founding ..." passage -- actually, it's more complicated than that. I, too, am happy to proselytize for freedom and democracy, but I don't think we can export it by force and I don't think we can expect the world to accept our noble intentions.
Ohio's Republican Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell has publicly labeled as "a complete idiot" an Election Protection attorney he is attempting to have sanctioned. Blackwell made the derogatory personal attack outside a banquet-laden conference in Columbus being sponsored by Diebold, ES&S, Triad and other voting machine vendors.

Blackwell told the 56th annual winter conference of the Ohio Association of Election Officials that the 2004 vote in Ohio was the "gold standard" for national balloting. "We were shocked when people flew in and said the election could be stolen," he told an audience of several hundred election officials from around the state. "The election was not perfect, but it was perfectly inspiring."

The four-day conference held January 25-8 a Columbus's Hyatt Regency Hotel features banquets, luncheons and parties (including one entitled "A Night in the Caribbean") sponsored by the nation's leading voting machine manufacturers, including ES&S, Diebold, Triad, Hart InterCivic and other names now widely associated with questions about the accuracy of the vote counts in the 2000, 2002 and 2004 elections.
Robert J. Fitrakis isn't the first person to accuse Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro of "political payback" and he probably won't be the last. Political payback appears to be the Petro's -- and the Ohio Republican Party's -- way of doing business.

Fitrakis made his "political payback" accusation on January 18 after Petro asked the Republican-dominated Ohio Supreme Court to sanction Fitrakis and three other lawyers who challenged the state's presidential election results in the Ohio Supreme Court on behalf of Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, the suit's principal target as Ohio's chief elections official.

Jefferson County Prosecutor Stephen M. Stern accused Petro of the same thing when he was state auditor in a October 19, 1997, story in The Columbus Dispatch headlined, "Probe seen as political payback."  

The story said Stern wasn't surprised when a special investigator from the state auditor's office showed up at his office earlier that year.

AUSTIN, Texas -- I wouldn't say it's the most earth-shaking issue around, but I'm fascinated by this fight the administration is picking with the media over "private accounts" versus "personal accounts."

Here's the state of play: Everybody went along in cheerful harmony describing the president's Social Security plan as "partial privatization," since it would allow younger workers to put a third or more of their payroll taxes into private accounts. President Bush called them "private accounts," everyone in the administration called them "private accounts," and Republicans, Democrats and the media all called them "private accounts."

Then, one day, some focus group showed that people, particularly older people, react negatively to any connection between Social Security and the word private. For some reason, people like the sound of "personal accounts" better than they do "private accounts."

Dear Mr. President: For the past 2-1/2 months I've been part of a collective effort to prove that your election on Nov. 2 was fraudulent, and indeed that your election in 2000 also. I'm not one of your supporters, needless to say. I stood among the protestors on Pennsylvania Avenue as your limousine sped by at about 30 m.p.h. on Jan. 20, holding a sign aloft that read, "NOV. 2---WORSE THAN WATERGATE."

  Imagine my surprise, then, to receive (on Jan. 24) an invitation to your inauguration. Included in the envelope was a solicitation for "Inaugural Collectibles," including a "Presidential Coaster Set, a "Lead Crystal Ice Bucket & Champagne Flute Set," and an "Inauguration Key Chain."

Since this generous invite arrived four days after-the-fact, and because you don't brook dissent very well, I know it can't be that you wanted my company on your big day. So from the choices provided below, please select the reason that comes closest to explaining why this invitation has been sent to me.  

1) It was a polite way of saying, "You're under surveillance."  

2) You confused me with the Robert Mills who designed the Washington Monument.
When the Multinational Monitor judges gather to pick the 10 worst corporations of the year, one of their instructions is: name no companies that appeared on the previous year's list (barring extraordinary circumstances).

For the 2004 list, that means no Bayer (even though in 2004 the company pushed for import of genetically modified rice into the European Union, polluted water in a South African town with the carcinogen hexavalent chromium, and was hit with evidence that its pain medication Aleve (naproxen) increases the risk of heart attack, among other egregious acts), no Boeing (despite new evidence that the tanker plane scandal costing U.S. taxpayers tens of billions of dollars is! even worse than it appeared), no Clear Channel (even though the radio behemoth in 2004 stooped to new lows with a "Breast Christmas Ever" contest that promised to pay for breast implants for a dozen contest "winners"),  and no  Halliburton (embroiled in a whole new set of contracting fraud and bribery charges in 2004).  But at least the no-repeat rule helps limit the field a bit.

And there remained plenty of worthy candidates.

"Agitation: discussion meant to arouse or increase dissatisfaction with things as they are and produce changes; work of an agitator." Webster's New World Dictionary

Progressive Democrats of America (PDA), an outgrowth of the Kucinich for President campaign, just concluded a large, successful national conference in Washington, D.C. Over 500 spirited, determined activists from all over the country came to the University of the District of Columbia for 48 hours of speeches, panels (too many!), workshops and informal person-to-person networking. The panels, the heart of the conference, were focused on issues like Iraq, Israel/Palestine, voting rights/electoral reform, defending social security, universal health care, progressive media, racism, veterans issues and progressive spirituality.

There were no panels or workshops having to do with endorsing candidates. There wasn't even organized public discussion about the internal struggle going on within the Democratic National Committee to determine who will replace Terry McAuliffe as DNC chair, although the vast majority of the Democrats present, I'm sure, are hoping Howard Dean wins that battle.

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS