Mr. Wasserman's column has crucially glaring omissions: GWB loves Jesus, is an instrument of God, and is doing God's work so if you don't believe me, just ask them.  Sadly, possibly nothing in the column can likely be refuted: the information is out there for the entire world to see, but is in the eye of the beholder(s).  Montel recently claimed in effect it has been proved that people who are cruel to animals don't care what they do humans: if so and if reports of a particular child blowing up frogs are true, nothing in Mr. Wasserman's column should be a surprise to any of us.

What is even more sad is the fact that more than 40%, possibly more than 50%, of voters will vote for GWB in November no matter what, no matter how horrific, gruesome, and/or destructive the record/policy initiatives/actions.  What is even more sad is not even three Republicans in the House would likely ever vote to impeach no matter what, no matter how damning and serious the almost certain mountain of high crimes, whereas only thirty years ago enough Republican senators would have voted to assure Richard Nixon's conviction.  What is even more sad is that more than 40% of

The blank document is the obvious retention of a progressive Ego. Not meant to represent the exactness of this perspective but a focus that makes a major circumstance understandable. At times I have experienced the bleak and harsh woe. Moaning and gnashing the thought was relentless in its assault. This is madness! Other times pure bliss was a fullfilling ripe and splendid state of phenomenon no matter were it a breath of fresh air or the moments relaxation that comes only from exaustion and completion.

And through all of the knowing of myself I am whole in spirit. In my being I have known and felt. What remains is never spent or wasted. Life is sucess! Death is victory. Wait and see, the motion of consortion is harmony. In our many ways humanity is custodian of the Earth. To whom we are the consort. The one will of our warrancy that is only a brief interlude in the vastness of the one known Universe. Likewise the individual soul not fettered is only an imagination. But enough to true each should they be able to respond.

It's time to stop beating around this Bush and start beating up on him--but good. There is no set of humanitarian or democratic principles by which this administration would not have been removed in any sane society. The last election was questionable at best, and his reckless, dangerous and criminal actions in the ensuing years have shown the whole world he is unfit to govern. The only democratic remedy, impeachment, was set aside early and forcibly by an opposition still afraid of its own shadow. It did make some sense, early on, to argue that, since the Greasy Oil Plutocrats (GOP) controlled both houses, it was a waste of time and energy.

AUSTIN, Texas -- It's quite difficult to convince people you are killing them for their own good. That's our basic problem in Iraq.

            You can try explaining that you are killing them in order to bring freedom and democracy to their nation -- "Freedom is the Almighty's gift to every man and woman in the world. And as the greatest power on the face of the earth, we have an obligation to help the spread of freedom," said President Bush. However, this argument is less than convincing if an American bomb or bullet has just killed your child. Or if you were among the 70 percent to 90 percent of the prisoners at Abu Ghraib who were there by accident.  

            Team, our national debate on this occupation is approaching the hopelessly dotty. This is no longer a matter of trying to decide if the glass is half-empty or half-full, or whether our media are looking at this through rose-colored glasses or through a glass darkly. What is, is. The trend lines get steadily worse.

As an attorney, I am asked about important court cases, including Brown v Board of Education (May 17, 1954; 50th anniversary is near).  No one can measure the monstrous impact of government schools imposing racism and teaching racism as official policy for so long.  Government school racism did much more damage than private enterprise could ever have afforded to do. It would have been better if government had stayed out of the schools altogether.

    The Brown decision ignores how government schools started the problem that Brown ended.  When government began socializing schools in the late 1800's, it expanded government-mandated racism.  Brown is another example of government peeing on everyone and then claiming that it was rain.

    The Pledge of Allegiance was written (1892) by a bigot who was a self-proclaimed national socialist and advocated that government should operate all schools as a socialist monopoly and end all of the better alternatives.  The government forced children to attend segregated schools where they recited the Pledge using it's original  straight-arm salute.