Advertisement

The latest polls show that most Americans are critical of the war in Iraq. But the option of swiftly withdrawing all U.S. troops from that country gets little media attention.

So far this year, many news outlets have lapsed into conjecture on what George W. Bush has in mind for the Iraq war. At the end of a recent lengthy editorial, the New York Times noted that “there’s speculation about whether President Bush intends to use the arrival of a new elected government [in Baghdad] as an occasion to declare victory and begin pulling out American troops.”

Right now, that kind of speculation amounts to a smokescreen for a war-crazed administration. Its evident intention is for large numbers of U.S. troops to stay in Iraq for a long time.

Predictably, as Seymour Hersh reports in the Jan. 24 edition of the New Yorker, “Bush’s re-election is regarded within the administration as evidence of America’s support for his decision to go to war. It has reaffirmed the position of the neoconservatives in the Pentagon’s civilian leadership who advocated the invasion.” According to one of
As the toxic dust settles on George W. Bush's second illegitimate inauguration, his moral legacy has been defined by the GOP's new attack on Ohio's 2004 election challenge legal team.

Republican Attorney General Jim Petro has attacked attorneys Bob Fitrakis, Susan Truitt, Cliff Arnebeck and Peter Peckarsky in front of the Ohio Supreme Court. Petro is demanding they be sanctioned and fined for filing the Moss v. Bush lawsuit that challenged the seating of Ohio's Republican Electoral College delegates.

Moss v. Bush has already entered the history books as the suit that set the legal framework for an unprecedented grassroots/internet campaign that brought the first Congressional challenge in US history to a state's Electoral delegation, a challenge that infuriated the Bush/Rove GOP.

Petro claims that Moss v. Bush suit was "frivolous." He says his punitive attack is about the "serious" nature of the court system.

In fact what Petro's doing is about revenge, intimidation and contempt for democracy and the law.

If you live outside the DC metropolitan area, you likely heard little about a man who parked his van in front of the White House this past Tuesday, threatening to blow it up if his political demands were not met.

There was never any need to worry. The FBI quickly assured the media, and therefore the public, that this is not an act of terrorism. After all, how could it be? The man in the van was white.

But wait. White males can be terrorists, too. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols became terrorists when they blew up a moving van full of explosives outside a federal building.

Perhaps there were other criteria that led the FBI to quickly discount a man parking his van claiming to be full of explosives outside the White House and threatening to blow it up if his demands were not met as not an act of terrorism. Reviewing what the government considers terrorism should bring some light on this subject.

Over 1500 men, all Muslim, were rounded up after 9/11 under the guise of fighting terrorism - making all 1500 suspected terrorists. How many were charged or convicted? None.

January 20, 2005

Warren Mitofsky
Mitofsky International
1776 Broadway - Suite 1708
New York, NY 10019

Larry Rosin
President
Edison Media Research
6 W. Cliff St.
Somerville, NJ 08876

Dear Mr. Mitofsky and Mr. Rosin:

January 20, 2005

The Hon. Jim Petro
Attorney General
State of Ohio
State Office Tower
30 E. Broad St, 17th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215

Dear Attorney General Petro:

Here is a link to the infamous Blackwell fundraising letter.  I believe he overstepped the legal line when he used Secretary of State envelopes and letterhead for a blatantly political appeal.  Did he also use State postage as well?

http://www.house.gov/judiciary_democrats/blackwellfundraisingltr.pdf

This man is dangerous and needs to be reigned in by our legal system.  If we can't get him for voter fraud, we should get him for stealing from the taxpayers.

It is interesting that this man is the embodiment of the Grover Norquist "drown the government in a bathtub" theory of government, has had nothing but tax funded jobs for years and years, and aspires to even more government funded jobs.

The analysis of the ruinous impact of his Amendment is outlined on the front page of the Dispatch today.  This is an analysis prepared by other Republicans!

If, as Hillary Clinton suggests, it takes a village to raise a child, then it is equally true that it takes a Bush to destroy that village, and kill that child. And I am not speaking of all those children slaughtered in their beds in Mosul, Fallujah and Baghdad during this President’s murderous invasion and occupation of Iraq.

No, on this occasion I am condemning, in advance, the upcoming invasions of Malaysia, Syria, Yemen, Algeria and Sudan, in addition of course to the first target, Iran, for which extremely detailed plans for strikes and invasion have already been drawn up. The New Yorker article by Seymour Hersh documents in exquisitely painful detail just what the Bush White House has planned as its next steps to extend the American Empire. Anyone who like myself wants to tell the President and his legions, “This far, but no further”, had best write, call, e-mail and visit their representatives in the U.S. House and the Senate and protest strongly against such an obviously criminal and immoral extension of American power.

It takes a nation to stop a Caesar.
Something's got to give.  Another election is just around the corner.  What's it going to be?  Another opportunity to document election "irregularities" and computer “glitches”?  Another chance to analyze mysterious exit polls?  Another exercise in frustration?  Another charade.  

Democrats will need a mighty good reason to go back to the polls.  Many believe that our elections are rigged.  And they have good reason.  Republicans own the voting machine companies that count 80% of the votes.  Congress and the courts are unlikely to change that.  And the Democratic leadership has hardly made it an issue.

So, let's do something different.  We'll go to Plan B.  We'll organize our own “Parallel Elections”.  

In 2004 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Inspector Generals (IG) issued reports revealing fraud, mismanagement and corruption. Here is my list of some of the Bush administration's Most Outrageous Scandals. 

1. Halliburton's Corruption. Nine different reports compiled by the GAO, the Coalition Provisional Authority's IG and the Defense Contract Audit Agency faulted Halliburton's performance in Iraq, where it has been awarded more than $10 billion in U.S. contracts. The government investigators cited, among other things, significant cost overruns, the overcharging of the Defense Department (and taxpayers) by $61 million, illegal kickbacks, failure to police subcontractors' billing and unauthorized expenses at the Kuwait Hilton Hotel.

2. Armstrong Williams received payola from US Department of Education to provide propaganda for “No Child Left Behind Program.”

3. CBS yielding to pressure from Bush Administration to discredit Dan Rather for reporting that Bush was AWOL from military when the report was right but the source was questionable,

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS