Advertisement

It was in June that President Bush first began talking about “revisionist history”, a gambit that took some of us a little by surprise since he showed no previous signs of having read any history, revisionist or otherwise.   

  This was a little after he delayed the homecoming of several hundred American sailors by using their aircraft carrier to proclaim that the war was over.  But if the war was over, and the point was to be rid of Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction, why were no weapons of mass destruction found, not even at the sites the U.S. said it had identified? It was those who were impertinent enough to raise this question that the president accused of revisionist history.  

            There’s been a lot of revisionist history around lately, from the president, and from the Democrats who are trying to distance themselves from a war that they couldn’t support strongly enough less than a year ago.     

 
The unfortunate poor, uneducated, ghetto drug addicts get 25 years in “real jail”. People in real, chronic, severe pain that are tormented for life are in their own “society imposed jail” with no way to escape. And Rush Limbaugh gets to become a celebrity for getting caught, and turning his high powered Public Relations lawyers loose with the proper spin on Rush’s pitiful dilemma.  

CNN and many TV news reports have fallen far short on high quality reports by only reporting on Rush Limbaugh's side of his addiction problem.    

According to other sources Rush allegedly coerced and threatened his housekeeper to illegally obtain more than 4500 Oxycontin in 47 days. The implication from her is that he was in no apparent pain and was just a pill popper who liked the feeling (the rush) and didn’t mind risking being addicted.    

It was an eyeopening, incredibly saddening moment to run across your views on Michael Medved's show the other day.  You need to look in the mirror Mr. Wasserman, as we frequently become what we profess not liking.  You want truth, but you cannot even answer a simple question.  Your truth must be only the way YOU want it revealed to others, who may lack the intelligence to see it for what it is or is not.  What energy you disperse in vitriol!  How much better used it would be otherwise.  I am older than you, but luckily, until the other day, I had never heard of you.  I hope never to again.

I thoroughly enjoyed listening to the Michael Medved show last Friday as Medved cleaned Wasserman's clock. As disgusted as I was with Wasserman spewing forth non-stop dog crap, I decided the more he spews out, the better. With all the sludge the socialists, bong-gurgling anarchists, Blame-America-first Chomskyites and conspiracy-theory crackpots spew forth, the more likely that President Bush will do a 50-state electoral sweep in November '04. So everybody keep flapping their jaws.

I see nothing in your publication about poor terry schiavo.  Whats been done to her is a miscarriage of justice and her fate much important than rush whom in the past smugly condemned anyone with a drug problem.  Rich people having drug problems are nothing new.  Poor people needing pain control and getting none is the norm.

Looks like the articles really opened a can of worms. As for me it seems that the only  flaw was  the wrong connection of Karl Rove to the  Nazis through relatives. That was a cheap shot. Nazism is a feature of character and  George W. has a nazi streak as is, not because he had some pro- nazi granddad. Everything else in the articles was right on the money.

As for Hitler being a socialist I can only  use the same words as is one of the letters: what a crock. We have so many professors in this world who for a lavish fee will come up with anything. Corporations were always uncomfortable with the Nuremberg discoveries of the alliance between the German big business and Hitler's  regime.  Sorry, folks, der Fuhrer was as much a socialist as George W. is a compassionate conservative. Same myth. Hitler and his henchmen were the  corporate dogs of Death.  We here are right to fear their revival in any form and size. And like it or not, the corporate fascism is on the move here. Just listen to the barking. Panurg
Republicans are at it again: New Bush scam--"letters from Iraq" are mass-produced.....will the press give the administration the hounding it deserves?

Newspapers around U.S. get identical missives from Iraq www.theolympian.com/home/news/20031011/frontpage/121390.shtml

"WASHINGTON -- Letters from hometown soldiers describing their successes rebuilding Iraq have been appearing in newspapers across the country as U.S. public opinion on the mission sours. And all the letters are the same. A Gannett News Service search found identical letters from different soldiers with the 2nd Battalion of the 503rd Airborne Infantry Regiment, also known as "The Rock," in 11 newspapers, including Snohomish, Wash. "

first saw The Olympian article linked at http://legitgov.org/index.html#breaking_news  
What the fuck are you people smoking? I've never read a bigger crock of shit in my life. Go crawl back under your rock!!!!!!!!!

OK!  We are fed up with all the Bush bashing that is going on!  Where were you nimrods when Clinton was abusing his office.....narry a word.

Since your article does not come with sources, its just useless vitriol...the paper it is printed on just went into the bottom of my bird cage.  

Since the bird just SH** on it, I guess what many of us think of your writings on the subject.

Mike Anderson
Hayden, ID.

Pages

Subscribe to Freepress.org RSS